“…Based on companion histological studies, they concluded that stage 1 strips were from the secretory stage of amelogenesis whereas stage 3 and 4, and possibly stage 2, strips were from the maturation stage of amelogenesis (Robinson et al, 1981b;Robinson and Kirkham, 1984a). While subsequently demonstrated to be a very powerful approach for studying enamel development in rat incisors (Robinson et al, 1977(Robinson et al, , 1979(Robinson et al, , 1982(Robinson et al, , 1983Kirkham, 1984a,b, 1985) and teeth of limited eruption (Glimcher et al, 1977;Robinson et al, 1978Robinson et al, , 1980Robinson et al, , 1981aRobinson et al, , 1988aDeutsch and Pe'er, 1982;Fincham et al, 1982;Deutsch et al, 1984;Kirkham, 1984a,b, 1985;Overall and Limeback, 1988), uncertainty remains about the exact location in a series of strips for the boundary between the secretory and maturation stages of amelogenesis (see Leblond and Warshawsky, 1979;Robinson et al, 1981b;Robinson and Kirkham, 1984a). Similarly, despite its use as a major reference point for enamel development, the location of the opaque boundary (Robinson et al, 1974(Robinson et al, , 1977(Robinson et al, , 1979(Robinson et al, , 1982(Robinson et al, , 1983Kirkham, 1984a, 1985) within the maturation stage of amelogenesis is not defined precisely at present.…”