2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-012-0323-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of methane emission and water productivity under different methods of rice crop establishment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the traditional method of growing rice involves flooding of rice fields with water and this has been documented to cause anaerobic decomposition of organic matter in the soil, which results in the release of methane, the second major greenhouse gas (USEPA 2006; Khosa et al 2011). Given its low use of water without flooding of rice fields, SRI has been documented to reduce methane emission by 22%-64% (Gathorne-Hardy et al 2013;Suryavanshi et al 2013;Choi et al 2014), making it a useful agricultural practice to mitigate climate change. Studies (Gathorne-Hardy et al 2013;Suryavanshi et al 2013) also show that the global warming potential of traditional rice fields is reduced by 20%-30% trough application of SRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the traditional method of growing rice involves flooding of rice fields with water and this has been documented to cause anaerobic decomposition of organic matter in the soil, which results in the release of methane, the second major greenhouse gas (USEPA 2006; Khosa et al 2011). Given its low use of water without flooding of rice fields, SRI has been documented to reduce methane emission by 22%-64% (Gathorne-Hardy et al 2013;Suryavanshi et al 2013;Choi et al 2014), making it a useful agricultural practice to mitigate climate change. Studies (Gathorne-Hardy et al 2013;Suryavanshi et al 2013) also show that the global warming potential of traditional rice fields is reduced by 20%-30% trough application of SRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given its low use of water without flooding of rice fields, SRI has been documented to reduce methane emission by 22%-64% (Gathorne-Hardy et al 2013;Suryavanshi et al 2013;Choi et al 2014), making it a useful agricultural practice to mitigate climate change. Studies (Gathorne-Hardy et al 2013;Suryavanshi et al 2013) also show that the global warming potential of traditional rice fields is reduced by 20%-30% trough application of SRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suryavanshi et al [238] conducted a similar experiment, also at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi, during the rainy season of 2010. Conventional transplanting of 21-day old seedlings was compared with SRI production of 12-day old seedlings.…”
Section: System Of Rice Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the SRI plots produced a significantly higher grain yield, while reducing the global warming potential by about 38%. The conventional plots received 18 irrigations (1170 mm), while the SRI plots received 12 irrigations (850 mm) [238].…”
Section: System Of Rice Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). En el Tolima el 68 % de los municipios (32) presentan un IUA mayor a 0.5, donde el 81.5% de agua es consumida por el sector agrícola y la mayor demanda hídrica está concentrada alrededor de los distritos de riego para el cultivo de arroz (6). Es importante tener en cuenta que el IUA se afecta por: a) la falta de educación ambiental (EA); b) la deficiente aplicación normativa (DAN); c) la poca adopción de tecnologías (AT); d) la contaminación hídrica (CH), y e) la deforestación y la ampliación de la frontera agrícola y pecuaria (DAFAP).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified