1997
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.1997.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of Burn Injuries at King Fahad Hospital, Al-Baha: A Study of 277 Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Taiwan and Hong Kong, the overall mortality rate were 3.7% ( 30 ) and 2.3% ( 31 ) respectively. The mortality rate in our study is quite similar to other reports ( 32 ). Under 10 year mortality rate was quite close to some reports from Kuwait (1.3%) ( 33 ) and Saudi Arabia (1.0%) ( 34 ), but too much better than the one reported from Iran (6.4%) ( 35 , 36 ) and India (60.8%) ( 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In Taiwan and Hong Kong, the overall mortality rate were 3.7% ( 30 ) and 2.3% ( 31 ) respectively. The mortality rate in our study is quite similar to other reports ( 32 ). Under 10 year mortality rate was quite close to some reports from Kuwait (1.3%) ( 33 ) and Saudi Arabia (1.0%) ( 34 ), but too much better than the one reported from Iran (6.4%) ( 35 , 36 ) and India (60.8%) ( 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Mortality rates reported by other studies include 5.4% and 11.5% (mean/median TBSA not stated) reported from Iraq [9,18], 6.4% (mean TBSA 19%) reported from Iran [19], 9% (mean TBSA burnt 18%) reported from Turkey [20] and 10.6% (mean TBSA burnt 21%) reported from Iran [17]. Lower rates have been reported from high income countries such as 1.3% (median TBSA burnt 13%) reported from Kuwait [16] and 2.8 (mean TBSA burnt 15%) reported from Saudi Arabia [21]. Since burn size is the most important risk factor for death, including in Sulaimaniyah [22], the relatively high mortality rate in the current study needs further studies to investigate.…”
Section: Explanation Of the Findings And Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Scald and liquid was responsible for burns in 156 cases or 44.6%, followed by burns due to flame and fire burns in 109 cases or 31.1% and in 85 cases or 24.3% the cause of facial burns were flame due electricity. Another similar study of 277 patients conducted by Mustafa H.Ali reported that scalds were the main causes of burn injuries with 49.1%, followed by flame burns with 37.5% (13). Nineteen or 5.4% of patients had only a facial burn and 331 of patients or 94.6% were patients who except face have burned other parts of the body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%