2000
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/13/4/317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern formation with a conservation law

Abstract: Abstract. Pattern formation in systems with a conserved quantity is considered by studying the appropriate amplitude equations. The conservation law leads to a large-scale neutral mode that must be included in the asymptotic analysis for pattern formation near onset. Near a stationary bifurcation, the usual Ginzburg-Landau equation for the amplitude of the pattern is then coupled to an equation for the large-scale mode. These amplitude equations show that for certain parameters all roll-type solutions are unst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
149
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, variation of the dependent variables on the long lengthscale (i.e. much longer than the critical wavelength) must be included, together with the potential for mode interaction (Matthews and Cox, 2000).…”
Section: A Weakly Nonlinear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, variation of the dependent variables on the long lengthscale (i.e. much longer than the critical wavelength) must be included, together with the potential for mode interaction (Matthews and Cox, 2000).…”
Section: A Weakly Nonlinear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is resisted only by the diffusion of magnetic field, which is weak over large horizontal scales. A quantitative calculation of the circumstances under which flux separation may develop was given by Matthews and Cox [7,13], by considering the stability of small-amplitude two-dimensional convection rolls near the onset of convection, under "ideal" boundary conditions. They began by noting a crucial feature of magnetoconvection, which is that the total flux of the magnetic field through the layer is a conserved quantity, and this leads to a large-scale neutral mode representing rearrangement of the magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near the onset of convection, the usual Ginzburg-Landau equation for the amplitude of convection rolls must be coupled to this large-scale mode: analysis of this coupled pair of equations then leads to the conclusion that all convection rolls can be made unstable near onset to an amplitude modulation on large horizontal scales. This instability occurs for small values of the magnetic diffusivity and moderate values of the imposed magnetic field [13]. Of course, such an idealized analysis of convection near onset cannot be applied directly to the numerical simulations of strongly nonlinear, compressible magnetoconvection [5,10], but it may help to suggest parameter regimes for future numerical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both µ 1 (L) and µ 2 (L) are functions of L -the domain size -only. Thus we have rigorously established the following bifurcation picture (see also Figure 3 of [7]). Recall that we do not have any condition on the minimal period L. Our results show that nontrival stable patterns exist for a Ginzburg-Landau equation coupled to an equation for a mean field, even when the coefficients of the equations are real and when the minimal period is finite.…”
Section: A(x + L) = A(x) B(x + L) = B(x) For All X ∈ R (13)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous numerical and analytical studies of these amplitude equation include [7] (numerical simulation, asymptotic expansion and bifurcation theory, in particular the use of Jacobi elliptic integrals to describe the shape of solutions and a numerical study of stability) and [8] (rigorous study of the limit when the minimal period is large enough). In [8] the resulting steady-states are pulses or spikes and nonlocal eigenvalue problems are used, but no Jacobi elliptic integrals.…”
Section: A(x + L) = A(x) B(x + L) = B(x) For All X ∈ R (13)mentioning
confidence: 99%