1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2789(99)00041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern formation in three-dimensional reaction–diffusion systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The point group of Γ y0 contains the 2π/3 rotations around the vertical axis, (α − ) 2 and (α − ) 4 , and the reflections on vertical planes (β − )(α − ), (β − )(α − ) 3 , (β − )(α − ) 5 . The point group of Σ y0 is α 2 , βα .…”
Section: Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point group of Γ y0 contains the 2π/3 rotations around the vertical axis, (α − ) 2 and (α − ) 4 , and the reflections on vertical planes (β − )(α − ), (β − )(α − ) 3 , (β − )(α − ) 5 . The point group of Σ y0 is α 2 , βα .…”
Section: Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The Brusselator model was more frequently employed in investigations than the LE; the two have been compared in some cases and display common features. 21,22 Many pattern types are possible in two and three dimensions and multistability between patterns is exhibited. Prediction of the type of pattern selected is therefore a formidable task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system size dependence causes the existence of characteristic domain size of the Turing patterns. Callahan and Knobloch [9] revealed that patterns become less regular because many unstable modes exist and interact each other as the domain grows. It is not cleared yet how such dependences work on the spherical surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%