2013
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern formation in the geosciences

Abstract: Pattern formation is a natural property of nonlinear and non-equilibrium dynamical systems. Geophysical examples of such systems span practically all observable length scales, from rhythmic banding of chemical species within a single mineral crystal, to the morphology of cusps and spits along hundreds of kilometres of coastlines. This article briefly introduces the general principles of pattern formation and argues how they can be applied to open problems in the Earth sciences. Particular examples are then dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, highconcentration particulate flows such as landslides can be described as viscoplastic fluids [37,49,50]. The scope of our paper is framed by this context, as well as studies presenting successful complementary views on geomorphology, most notably: the formal statistical mechanics formulation of sediment transport by Furbish and colleagues [51,52], and related probabilistic and stochastic approaches in geomorphology [53][54][55][56]; nonlinear/dynamical-systems approaches to landscape pattern formation [57][58][59][60]; hydrodynamic and classical stability analyses [3,4]; and reviews justifying the applicability of smallscale experiments to natural landscapes [61,62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, highconcentration particulate flows such as landslides can be described as viscoplastic fluids [37,49,50]. The scope of our paper is framed by this context, as well as studies presenting successful complementary views on geomorphology, most notably: the formal statistical mechanics formulation of sediment transport by Furbish and colleagues [51,52], and related probabilistic and stochastic approaches in geomorphology [53][54][55][56]; nonlinear/dynamical-systems approaches to landscape pattern formation [57][58][59][60]; hydrodynamic and classical stability analyses [3,4]; and reviews justifying the applicability of smallscale experiments to natural landscapes [61,62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desiccation crack patterns observed in natural systems span many orders of magnitude in size ( Fig. 1) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Among the large diversity of desiccation crack patterns, polygonal patterns are the most common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic cluster size has been found to vary widely depending on drying dynamics, packing size, friction with a substrate, capillarity, and grain-scale factors such as grain stiffness and size [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Recent work has taken a first step towards predicting these dependencies by applying classical Griffith crack theory, in which cracking is governed by a balance of strain and surface energies [22,23], to granular packings [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, while this approach can describe how the characteristic cluster size scales with packing thickness [21], quantitative prediction of cluster size remains elusive for many materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain shrinkage is common to many materials including clays, soils, coatings, biological tissues, and foods, for which the stresses resulting from shrinkage often dominate over externally applied stresses [24,25]. Nevertheless, while some models account for macroscopic shrinkage during drying by considering grain densification and deformation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], only recently has individual grain shrinkage been recognized as a factor that can strongly affect cracking-often in unexpected ways [26]. Unfortunately, how grain shrinkage influences the final cluster size after drying is unknown; no current theory of cracking incorporates this behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%