2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern formation during cubic to orthorhombic martensitic transformations in shape memory alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as discussed by Gao et al, 41) there is one-to-one correspondence between the OR and invariant plane orientation. Hence, the OR can be determined if the invariant plane normal is predicted by the phase-field simulation based on the microelasticity theory.…”
Section: Slip Distribution In the α′ Phasementioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, as discussed by Gao et al, 41) there is one-to-one correspondence between the OR and invariant plane orientation. Hence, the OR can be determined if the invariant plane normal is predicted by the phase-field simulation based on the microelasticity theory.…”
Section: Slip Distribution In the α′ Phasementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Phase field (PhF) simulation of different types of first-order solid-solid phase transformations is a widely used and validated simulation methodology [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. PhF is employed here using the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) type polynomial energy function.…”
Section: Phase Field (Phf) Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic strain energy associated with the shear transformation strain is formulated using the Khachatruyan and Shatalov's microelasticity theory [38]. A stress-free boundary condition is applied in this investigation [32,[39][40], and the elastic strain energy is given by:…”
Section: Microelasticity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%