2006
DOI: 10.1139/z06-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patrons de reproduction des femelles d’isard (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) dans une population non chassée et conséquences démographiques

Abstract: From the long-term monitoring of isard females ( Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica Bonaparte, 1845) marked in two areas of the Parc National des Pyrénées (France) with a quite constant population size for 20 years, we have conducted an analysis of age variation in recruitment (estimated as the proportion of offspring surviving through the winter per female). As predicted for a well-established high-density population, recruitment rates were low for young females (0.156 at 3 years of age and 0.221 at 4 years of age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the age‐specific variation in reproductive value (Fig. 1) may also be affected by deviations from the stable age‐distribution that are known to influence the demographic variation of ungulate populations (Festa‐Bianchet et al 2003, Crampe et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the age‐specific variation in reproductive value (Fig. 1) may also be affected by deviations from the stable age‐distribution that are known to influence the demographic variation of ungulate populations (Festa‐Bianchet et al 2003, Crampe et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summer, 82%-100% of primeaged females are accompanied by a kid (Houssin et al 1993;Pérez-Barberia et al 1998;Loison et al 2002), but it is usually unknown if reproductive failure represents variability in female fecundity or in early juvenile survival. For the Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica Bonaparte, 1845), a closely related species (Masini and Lovari 1988), female survival is very high and stable, whereas juvenile survival is density-dependent (Crampe et al 2006), suggesting a conservative reproductive strategy. Female chamois should be capital breeders, as they live in a very seasonal environment where they subsist on low-quality forage during winter, the time of gestation, and then gain about 3 kg (12% of the mean mass) in late summer (Pioz et al 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human exploitation (fishery, hunting or harvesting) adds selective pressures that can strongly influence the life histories of individuals (Milner, Nilsen & Andreassen 2007;Allendorf et al 2008). Between-population differences in the levels of exploitation lead to contrasting demographic tactics through changes in generation time (Crampe et al 2006;Nilsen et al 2009), a key variable for both demography (Lebreton & Clobert 1991) and evolution . Thus, a high rate of exploitation of adults relative to juveniles leads to an increased reproductive effort early in life (Festa-Bianchet 2003;Proaktor, Coulson & Milner-Gulland 2007) as expected from theory (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%