2010
DOI: 10.3366/e1354991x10000863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patronal Care and Maternal Feeling: New Correspondence between Ann Yearsley and Hannah More

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recounting her reaction to the news that her earnings from Poems, on Several Occasions were to be placed in trust, Yearsley wrote: I felt as a mother deemed unworthy the tuition or care of her family; and imagined my conduct and principles must of necessity be falsely represented to a generous public, in order to justify the present measure.-Even the interest was not allowed me, but on the capricious terms, that she [More] should lay it out as she thought proper; without any condition in the deed whereby my children might have an undeniable claim in future. 15 As I have argued elsewhere, More's behaviour here is understood by Yearsley as an usurpation of her maternal role and her maternal rights 16 ; in an earlier, private letter to More, Yearsley had forcefully argued, "the right was mine to Educate and set them in life as their dispositions may in future determine . .…”
Section: Ii: the Bristol Milkwoman And The London Newspapersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recounting her reaction to the news that her earnings from Poems, on Several Occasions were to be placed in trust, Yearsley wrote: I felt as a mother deemed unworthy the tuition or care of her family; and imagined my conduct and principles must of necessity be falsely represented to a generous public, in order to justify the present measure.-Even the interest was not allowed me, but on the capricious terms, that she [More] should lay it out as she thought proper; without any condition in the deed whereby my children might have an undeniable claim in future. 15 As I have argued elsewhere, More's behaviour here is understood by Yearsley as an usurpation of her maternal role and her maternal rights 16 ; in an earlier, private letter to More, Yearsley had forcefully argued, "the right was mine to Educate and set them in life as their dispositions may in future determine . .…”
Section: Ii: the Bristol Milkwoman And The London Newspapersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An abrupt apostrophe to the sympathetic reader, however, suddenly changes the poem from the individuated or personal to the universal: Ye, whose imaginations fondly rove O'er future pleasure in its richest dress, Ye who avow that soft parental love, Whose pleasing cares were ever meant to bless, Ye sure will own it nature's truest joy, When absence long hath your fond bosoms torn, Ardent to hold the infant girl, or boy, Whose flutt'ring heart shall hail your wish'd return. (lines [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] This apostrophe invites readers to sympathize with the speaker, to feel as she does in thinking of their own children as being at the cause of "nature's truest joy." This invitation serves to do (at least) two things, I would suggest.…”
Section: Ii: the Bristol Milkwoman And The London Newspapersmentioning
confidence: 99%