Patriotism and Nationalism, Left and Right: A Q‐Methodology Study of American National Identity

Abstract

In the current polarized U.S. political environment, what it means to be a “true American” is increasingly contested. Researchers often look to conceptualizations of patriotism and nationalism to account for national identity; but the extent to which these measures capture current understandings of American identity beyond left and right political divides is unknown. In a novel application of Q‐methodology, this study investigates the relationship between patriotism and nationalism measures and participants’ subjective understandings of their national identity. Forty‐seven U.S. citizens representing a wide range of ideological positions constructed American identity profiles by ranking 56 statements taken from patriotic and nationalistic operationalizations. The two extracted profiles revealed national identities largely along left/right ideological, not patriotism/nationalism, lines. Further analysis indicated that the political left and right also differently interpret items within patriotism and nationalism measures. These findings highlight the intertwining of American national identity and political ideology; they also cast doubt on the ideological independence and descriptive value of patriotism and nationalism measures.

The individual and the nation: A qualitative analysis of US liberal and conservative identity content

“…For example, operationalisations of equality demonstrate asymmetry between the two ideologies in their support for the value (Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003;Rokeach, 1973). In contrast, other researchers have found a high level of support for the principle of equal treatment on both the American left and right when participants are asked about the value directly (Citrin, Reingold, & Green, 1990;Hanson & O'Dwyer, 2018;Theiss-Morse, 2009). Such inconsistencies suggest a disconnect between how researchers and (particularly conservative) participants define these values-understanding how individuals incorporate these values into their ideological identities may provide insight into this incongruence.…”

The Partisan Sorting of "America": How Nationalist Cleavages Shaped the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

“…It is possible that nationalist beliefs represent yet another cultural domain that has undergone partisan sorting over the past two decades (Hanson and O'Dwyer 2018). Not only would this be consistent with the broader trend toward polarization in U.S. political culture, but it would also help explain support for Donald Trump's ethno-nationalist politics-and perhaps that of predecessor movements and candidates like the Tea Party and Sarah Palinin the presence of aggregate stability in nationalist beliefs: even if demand for this type of politics did not increase in the population as a whole, it may have grown among the subset of Americans who identify with the Republican Party.…”

No Additional Evidence that Proximity to the July 4th Holiday Affects Affective Polarization

“…However, it is possible that growing differences between Democrats and Republicans limit the effectiveness of the American identity to function as a common ingroup. Democrats and Republicans have different ideas about what American identity means (Hanson & O'Dwyer, 2019). Rutchick and Eccleston (2010) argue that because Democrats and Republicans are perceived to have rather different ideas about what the American identity means, it may be less able to harmoniously unite these subgroups.…”