2020
DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients With Severe Gastrointestinal Dysmotility Disorders Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition Have Similar Survival As Those With Short‐Bowel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Introduction Severe gastrointestinal dysmotility disorder (GID) constitute approximately 20% of patients requiring home parenteral nutrition (HPN), whereas short‐bowel syndrome (SBS) remains the most frequent indication for HPN. This study's aim was to characterize GID patients and compare clinical parameters and survival to SBS patients. Similarly, clinical comparisons between sclerodermaand nonscleroderma patients were made. Methods Demographic and clinical data for all patients was extracted from the Canadi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, long‐term PN was felt to be safe, with the majority of those surveyed reporting either similar or better survival outcomes compared to other causes of intestinal failure. The experiences of the survey participants are consistent with published survival outcomes from long‐term PN centers 3,12,36,37 . These data therefore suggest that long‐term PN should only be reserved for use as an important life sustaining treatment for patients with CIPO and ED related intestinal failure, and not used to treat symptoms alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, long‐term PN was felt to be safe, with the majority of those surveyed reporting either similar or better survival outcomes compared to other causes of intestinal failure. The experiences of the survey participants are consistent with published survival outcomes from long‐term PN centers 3,12,36,37 . These data therefore suggest that long‐term PN should only be reserved for use as an important life sustaining treatment for patients with CIPO and ED related intestinal failure, and not used to treat symptoms alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The experiences of the survey participants are consistent with published survival outcomes from long-term PN centers. 3,12,36,37 These data therefore suggest that long-term PN should only be reserved for use as an important life sustaining treatment for patients with CIPO and ED related intestinal failure, and not used to treat symptoms alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this group, patient survival was not impacted by known intestinal anatomy, patient age, or sex. However, a separate report from a Canadian cohort found higher mortality with patient age, PN dependence, number of hospitalizations, and use of immunosuppressants 25 …”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, a separate report from a Canadian cohort found higher mortality with patient age, PN dependence, number of hospitalizations, and use of immunosuppressants. 25 Comparing patients with SBS with those in the general population has been less frequently studied. A recent analysis of UK data indicates that individuals with SBS had a 6.8-fold higher mortality rate than for the general UK population.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is relatively recent data from a number of intestinal failure units internationally supporting this with 5-year survival rates on parenteral nutrition of 70–85%, 16 , 66–68 which are comparable to survival rates in patients with short bowel syndrome. 6 , 67 It is becoming apparent that parenteral nutrition requirements and long-term dependency are higher in patients with the CIPO sub-type, 4 , 16 , 17 therefore underlining the importance of recognising this sub-type separately to guide management.…”
Section: Current Approaches To the Management Of Severe Gastrointestinal Dysmotilitymentioning
confidence: 99%