2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610561104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences

Abstract: Amnesic patients have a well established deficit in remembering their past experiences. Surprisingly, however, the question as to whether such patients can imagine new experiences has not been formally addressed to our knowledge. We tested whether a group of amnesic patients with primary damage to the hippocampus bilaterally could construct new imagined experiences in response to short verbal cues that outlined a range of simple commonplace scenarios. Our results revealed that patients were markedly impaired r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

92
1,229
7
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,214 publications
(1,369 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
92
1,229
7
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Seminal work regarded mental time as ''episodic thinking" -a combination of self-related episodic memory recall and episodic future imagination Atance & O'Neill, 2001;Okuda et al, 2003;Schroots & Assink, 2005;Tulving, 1984Tulving, , 2002, whereas more recent authors proposed that mental time can be seen as ''self-projection" in time, similarly to ''self-projection" in space, emphasizing the role of visuo-spatial perspective taking, spatial navigation, and mental imagery in mental time (Arzy et al, 2008;Buckner & Carroll, 2007;Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, & Maguire, 2007). The current results support the latter proposal, as ''self-projection" in time was found to be similar to past and future, and different from the now where judgements do not involve such ''self-projection" in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seminal work regarded mental time as ''episodic thinking" -a combination of self-related episodic memory recall and episodic future imagination Atance & O'Neill, 2001;Okuda et al, 2003;Schroots & Assink, 2005;Tulving, 1984Tulving, , 2002, whereas more recent authors proposed that mental time can be seen as ''self-projection" in time, similarly to ''self-projection" in space, emphasizing the role of visuo-spatial perspective taking, spatial navigation, and mental imagery in mental time (Arzy et al, 2008;Buckner & Carroll, 2007;Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, & Maguire, 2007). The current results support the latter proposal, as ''self-projection" in time was found to be similar to past and future, and different from the now where judgements do not involve such ''self-projection" in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to imagine new future events was assessed with an adaptation of the procedure developed by Hassabis et al (2007). On the basis of six pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Lang et al, 1995) (i.e., three pictures with positive valence matched with three pictures with negative valence), 2 participants had to simulate a future event (as had been done previously to assess autobiographical memory in schizophrenia; D 'Argembeau et al, 2008;Neumann et al, 2007).…”
Section: Experimental Task Assessing Future Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the seminal work in both rats and non‐human primates—which identified HC cells attuned to allocentric location [O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978] and spatial view [Rolls, 1999]—recent models of human medial temporal lobe (MTL) function highlight the HC as an important structure for scene processing, via a proposed role in representing complex and conjunctive scene stimuli [Graham et al, 2010; Lee et al, 2012; Murray et al, 2007] and/or by contributions to viewpoint‐independent scene construction [Bird and Burgess, 2008; Maguire and Mullally, 2013; Zeidman et al, 2015]. These complex HC scene representations have been shown to support behavioural performance across a range of cognitive domains, including recognition memory [Bird et al, 2008; Taylor et al, 2007], short‐term memory [Hannula et al, 2006; Hartley et al, 2007], working memory [Lee and Rudebeck, 2010a, 2010b; Park et al, 2003], perceptual learning [Mundy et al, 2013], higher‐order perception [Aly et al, 2013; Barense et al, 2005, 2010; Kolarik et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2005b] and scene imagination [Hassabis et al, 2007]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%