2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01944.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients with acute myocardial infarction using ambulance or private transport to reach definitive care: which mode is quicker?

Abstract: Although private transportation results in a faster trip to the hospital, quicker definitive care is obtained with the use of ambulance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be related to unavailability of ambulance at the time of event or a decision made in search of shorter time to medical care. In 2010, Song published an article comparing modes of transportation in case of an AMI in terms of efficacy and patient selection [15]. His results were very similar to ours in that 62.7% of the patients arrived in private transportation whereas only 37.3% arrived on ambulance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It could be related to unavailability of ambulance at the time of event or a decision made in search of shorter time to medical care. In 2010, Song published an article comparing modes of transportation in case of an AMI in terms of efficacy and patient selection [15]. His results were very similar to ours in that 62.7% of the patients arrived in private transportation whereas only 37.3% arrived on ambulance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, if arrival to hospital is the main goal, then using a private transport is much faster and less dependent for patients and relatives. Nevertheless, when using administration of reperfusion therapy as a more rigorous measure of treatment initiation, then use of ambulance was associated with a significant decrease in door-to-balloon time [15]. This is an area to be investigated in order to assess if our population would absolutely benefit from increased implementation of EMS in order to reduce mortality and complications in patients presenting with AMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one considers that initial antiischemic treatment is often delivered by EMS, then EMS use would certainly lead to shorter delays to medical contact and treatment. 19,20 The magnitude of our findings is even more striking when they are considered in the context of the impact made by recent national campaigns to improve STEMI systems of care (eg, the Door-to-Balloon campaign was associated with a 14-minute reduction in door-to-balloon times). 21 Furthermore, use of EMS transport was associated with expedited in-hospital STEMI care.…”
Section: Impact On Process Of Care Measuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[17][18][19][20] Although isolated transportation times were shorter for private transportation, patients with myocardial infarction admitted by EMS had significantly shorter time intervals to definite treatment, such as door-toballoon or door-to-needle times. 8,20,21 With increasing information about CPUs in the population, patients refer themselves to a CPU in the case of acute chest pain or with other acute problems presumably of cardiac origin. In current ESC guidelines on myocardial revascularization self-referral is already included in the myocardial infarction patient pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%