Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes reduce morbidity and mortality in cardiac patients, with effect sizes that are comparable to those of antiplatelet, lipid-lowering or blood pressure-lowering therapy. In addition, participation in CR programmes increases quality of life [1]. Current guidelines indicate a class 1A recommendation for CR [2,3].However, only a minority of cardiac patients participate in these programmes. This is related to limited capacity, to low referral rates (particularly in patients with chronic cardiac conditions) and to patient factors that include age, socioeconomic status and practical issues such as geographical distance [4]. Dropout from CR programmes is mainly related to these same factors. Dropout is associated with unfavourable outcomes, as reported by Sunamura et al. in this issue [5]. Premature termination of the CR programme represents a loss of benefits, a waste of resources and a waste of the limited capacity for CR. Patients who do complete a centre-based CR programme are commonly not offered follow-up coaching and support. Most programmes are limited to a duration of 12 weeks, after which a loss of effect on risk profiles and exercise capacity is to be expected.Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has the potential to overcome several of the barriers and limitations of the current centre-based CR. Patient volumes may be significantly greater, travel issues (including costs and pollution) are avoided, coaching and support can be