2005
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations

Abstract: The foundations that underpin the value of personal care from the patients' perspective could be based on categories found in this study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
95
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were all selected by their GPs as being in holding doctor-patient relationships, which will have influenced their interview accounts. 27 Patient responders had all been registered with their practices for between 3 and 20 years, and it is not known how patients who move practices frequently might respond.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were all selected by their GPs as being in holding doctor-patient relationships, which will have influenced their interview accounts. 27 Patient responders had all been registered with their practices for between 3 and 20 years, and it is not known how patients who move practices frequently might respond.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 This, and the relative reluctance of older patients and those with chronic conditions to be treated by GPRs, 12 is consistent with the medical literature on continuity of care. 6,34 Previous research has shown continuity means more to patients who share a history of significant events with their physician, 35 describing the sense of security that access to a regular GP provides to those who are chronically ill. 36 These factors work against the willingness of these patients to see a newly introduced GPR.…”
Section: Patient Acceptance Of Being Treated By Gprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,27 It has been recognised elsewhere that patients' understanding of the role of doctors-in-training requires improvement 38,39 as does communication around transfer of care between doctors. 40 Patients with chronic illnesses have reported less satisfactory doctor-patient communication if they did not have personal continuity with a regular GP, 36 a difficulty which has the potential to be compounded by the relative inexperience of the GPR. 27 Implications for training practices and future research…”
Section: Patient Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding results have also been demonstrated regarding trauma patients’ perceptions of nursing care (Berg, Spaeth, Sook, Burdsal, & Lippoldt, 2012). On the other hand, unsatisfactory caring relationships may result in a loss of trust, even if the medical treatment itself is been successful, which is in line with Bultzingslöwen, Eliasson, Sarvimäki, Mattsson, and Hjortdahl (2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Caring relationships may help patients to understand themselves and the situation, and thereby strengthen their capability and power to seek care at the right level, as shown in this study. Further research has shown that continuity among caregivers also increases opportunities for winning the patient’s trust, by increasing understanding of individual needs (Abrahamsson et al, 2015; Bultzingslöwen et al, 2006; Redsell, Stokes, Jackson, & Baker, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%