2016
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000001878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients’ Preferences for Treatment for Dupuytren’s Disease

Abstract: This study confirms the importance of low recurrence rates and complete contracture corrections, but also emphasizes the significance of low complication rates. Convalescence was not an attribute, which scored high. The preference heterogeneity shows that patient consultations need to be targeted differently, which may result in different treatment decisions, depending on patient characteristics and preferences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And the goal should be to greatly reduce or even eliminate recurrences. This is in accordance with the statements by patients who say what they are seeking are treatment options offering low rates of recurrence, complete finger extension, and minimal convalescence [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…And the goal should be to greatly reduce or even eliminate recurrences. This is in accordance with the statements by patients who say what they are seeking are treatment options offering low rates of recurrence, complete finger extension, and minimal convalescence [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further research is warranted in this area, which we believe can address a knowledge gap regarding the concerns and needs that influence treatment decision-making among patients with Dupuytren’s disease. 28 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second limitation is that we could not reliably assess rates of recurrence, which may be as relevant to patients in treatment decision-making as early outcomes, because of the limited time-horizon of our study. 30 Third, only a subset of patients completed the MHQ. Although this might have influenced our results, the possibility for attrition bias seems small because there were no differences in the characteristics between those who did and did not complete the MHQ at follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, clients' need for knowledge was closely connected to being involved in making decisions regarding treatment; these could be decisions about treatment options or the anaesthetic procedure. It has been shown in a recent study that there is substantial heterogeneity in clients' preferences for different treatment options, which can be addressed by shared decision-making (18). However, the present study shows that not all clients may be comfortable with being involved in making decisions, especially concerning specific medical decisions such as the anaesthetic procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%