2001
DOI: 10.1080/028134301750235277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients, diagnoses and processes in general practice in the Nordic countries.An attempt to make data from computerised medical records available for comparable statistics

Abstract: This survey demonstrates that valid and reliable data for routine statistics are available from computerised medical records in general practice. The major obstacle extracting more epidemiological data from computerised medical records is caused by information in the databases not being uniquely linked to episodes of care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norwegian GPs’ available equipment was described in an extensive report from 1981 [7], but both the organisation of the primary health care system and the available diagnostic and therapeutic equipment has changed significantly since then. A study from 2001 explored differences in consultation rates and diagnoses given by Nordic GPs [8]. Some more recent studies from other European countries describe the spectrum of medical equipment in the respective countries [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norwegian GPs’ available equipment was described in an extensive report from 1981 [7], but both the organisation of the primary health care system and the available diagnostic and therapeutic equipment has changed significantly since then. A study from 2001 explored differences in consultation rates and diagnoses given by Nordic GPs [8]. Some more recent studies from other European countries describe the spectrum of medical equipment in the respective countries [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although major depression is under-detected in primary care (Harman et al, 2006), in the past decade there has been a push to increase detection in Sweden general practice (Hansson et al, 2008) and the discordance between primary care and clinical interviews is generally one of specific diagnosis (e.g., major depression vs. dysthymia) rather than whether or not psychopathology is present at all (Tiemens et al, 1999). Also, the quality and validity of electronic medical records from primary care in Sweden is high (Nilsson et al, 2003; Grimsmo et al, 2001), and the relative availability of primary and psychiatric care in Sweden should increase the detection of major depression relative to places such as the United States. Also, we did not have information on potential behavioral mediators of the depression-diabetes relationship, including smoking, diet, body mass index, and physical activity; however, other reports have indicated that the relationship between depression and risk of type 2 diabetes persists after accounting for these factors (Mezuk et al, 2008a, 2008b; Knol et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All linkages were performed by the use of an individual national identification number that is assigned to each person in Sweden for their lifetime, which was replaced by a serial number for analysis in order to provide anonymity. The quality and validity of electronic medical records from primary care in Sweden is high (Nilsson et al, 2003; Grimsmo et al, 2001). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) represent the majority (50–60%) of all infections in Swedish primary care and therefore are at focus for efforts to optimise antibiotic prescribing [18, 19] Media campaigns to the public and structured implementation of new guidelines regarding RTIs have been performed on a national basis. Many years of structured work by the Swedish strategic programme against antibiotic resistance (Strama) has significantly reduced the antibiotic use over the last decade [18, 20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%