2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0518-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients as experts: characterizing the most relevant patient-reported outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a formal method of working with experts to achieve consensus, involving several rounds of assessments, presentation of interim results, and expert discussion between rounds. After a review of high-quality modified Delphi studies [15][16][17], and consistent with modified Delphi analyses of similar blood cancer questions [18], we aimed for a predetermined consensus level of 75% agreement among our expert panelists. Participants in our panel were recruited from the roster of MDS experts attending the March 2018 Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation (AAMDSIF) Bone Marrow Failure Disease Scientific Symposium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a formal method of working with experts to achieve consensus, involving several rounds of assessments, presentation of interim results, and expert discussion between rounds. After a review of high-quality modified Delphi studies [15][16][17], and consistent with modified Delphi analyses of similar blood cancer questions [18], we aimed for a predetermined consensus level of 75% agreement among our expert panelists. Participants in our panel were recruited from the roster of MDS experts attending the March 2018 Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation (AAMDSIF) Bone Marrow Failure Disease Scientific Symposium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%