KEYWORDSSummary Implementation of spirometry in the primary care setting is controversial. Spirometry allows a unique non-invasive look into the functioning of the lungs, which can be both medically informative and of practical value. Respiratory complaints are among the most prevalent in primary care, while smoking rates remain globally high, illustrating the need for proper tools to investigate the possible causes of chronic pulmonary symptoms. Smoking cessation programs and disease management programs are the preferred treatment strategies for COPD; these rely on a valid spirometric diagnosis, as promoted by international COPD guidelines. In addition, involving the patient in treatment plans and explaining the detrimental effects of smoking can be greatly facilitated by the visual impact of a flow-volume curve, have promoted the use of spirometry. While there are difficulties in implementation of spirometry in primary care. Provided that quality standards of performance and training are sufficiently met, evidence suggests that spirometry is a valid, feasible and interpretable diagnostic tool in a primary care setting. COPD is a growing problem for society, which should not be underestimated, and with sufficient funding, adequate training and motivated healthcare workers, there is no good reason why spirometric testing cannot be widely implemented. © 2003 General Practice Airways Group. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Over the past few years, increasing attention has been paid to the detection and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care, in part caused by the worldwide increase in burden and mortality [1]. In contrast with other major diseases, the prevalence of COPD will continue to rise, predominantly caused by an increase in the numbers of female patients with COPD [2]. Early diagnosis of COPD is important, since smoking cessation can reduce the rate of progression to severe disease [3], which benefits each patient and every practice. There are, however, both patient-and healthcare provider-related factors which hamper * Tel.: +31-43-3882315; fax: +31-43-3619344.E-mail address: niels.chavannes@hag.unimaas.nl (N. Chavannes). this early detection [4], in particular underreporting of complaints and lack of active detection.Spirometry is being increasingly implemented throughout primary care in Western Europe, and in some countries is now being used in the majority of practices [5,6]. GPs seem to appreciate this relatively new tool highly [7], as it generates diagnostic information previously unattainable in primary care. It provides a comprehensive overview of airflow and lung capacity, and with high quality measurement, permits an accurate and reliable diagnosis of obstructive airways disease and the degree of reversibility. A recent study has shown for the first time that performing simple spirometric tests in the primary care setting produces results at least as good as those of pulmonary function laboratories [8]. Recognizing patterns of obstruction,