Patientology revisited: Toward tailored care pathways

Abstract

Background: Concepts such as patient-centred care, patient empowerment and patient participation have challenged our understanding of what it means to be a patient and what role patients play in care pathways. Consequently, patientology as the medical sociological and anthropological study of patients is currently being reconceptualized through perspectives of health as individualized and privatized capital.Aims: This article explores the potential of such a patientological perspective to enhance our understanding of and tailor care pathways. Particularly, we aim to investigate how such a perspective can contribute to tailoring care pathways to the capacities of individual patients and their relatives.Materials & Methods: We elaborate on an emerging health capital-theoretic model for patientology and study its potential for optimizing care pathways through two distinct cases of care contexts: communicative challenges in the context of integrative primary care for vulnerable chronically ill multi-morbid patients and the potential of parent involvement in the acute hospitalization of children suspected to be affected by multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Results:Our results shed light on the importance of cultural and social capital of patients and their relatives in the design of effective tailored care pathways. We find that a lack of cultural and social capital presents a significant barrier to effective communication between patients and the healthcare professionals involved in their care pathways. We also find that understanding the cultural and social capital of relatives provides an entry point to their effective involvement in the care pathways of their children. Discussion & Conclusion:The implications of these findings extend beyond the concrete care contexts studied. This article contributes to our understanding of care pathways through a perspective of health inequalities being based on differences in health capital and demonstrates how the health capital-theoretic patientology model facilitates the systematic development of guidelines for healthcare professionals to assess patients' resources and tailor their care pathways accordingly.

Cardiovascular Disease-Related Health Promotion and Prevention Services by Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia: How Well Are They Prepared?

“…This may be due to the professional practice standards that specifically include standards on health promotion and education, counseling, screening and risk assessment, and disease state management in those countries. Integrating CVD-prevention and health-promotion activities into pharmacies should be considered a valuable option in Saudi Arabia, as many studies have confirmed the clinical benefits and practicability of CVD-prevention and health-promotion services provided by pharmacists [20][21][22][23].…”

Heart-to-heart with ChatGPT: the impact of patients consulting AI for cardiovascular health advice

“…The correlation between prompt and response quality also has the potential to amplify existing health inequalities, increasing the health literacy and agency of those who already possess relatively high levels and yielding little to no benefits for those who do not. 21 Ultimately, this can be expected to amplify differences regarding key areas of contemporary health policy such as patient involvement, education and empowerment.…”

Caring and Health of Close Family Members of Frail Older Persons Recently Discharged from Acute Hospital Care: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

“…Nurses in hospital settings have an important role to play in supporting family caregivers’ feelings of readiness for new and expanded caregiving roles after discharge [ 27 ]. Nurses need to be knowledgeable about the patient’s care pathway in order to identify barriers relevant to the family member’s care, such as a lack of relevant knowledge, a lack of trust and social support, and a lack of resources on the part of the patient and the family member, which may hinder successful communication between nurses and the family [ 28 ]. The demanding period after discharge from acute hospital care, often defined by an increased burden of care, may have a negative impact on the wellbeing and health of close family members.…”