Patient Trust in Physician Influences Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low-Income Patients

Abstract

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but underutilized. Although physician recommendation is an important predictor of screening, considerable variation in CRC screening completion remains. Purpose To characterize the influence of patient trust in care providers on CRC screening behavior. Methods Data were collected as part of a cluster–randomized CRC screening intervention trial performed in the San Francisco Community Health Network from March 2007 to January 2012 (analysis, Spring 2012). All study participants received a recommendation to complete CRC screening from their primary care provider (PCP). Included participants were aged 50–79 years, not current with screening, and completed the Wake Forest Trust Scale (WFTS) measuring trust in PCPs and doctors in general. Primary outcome was CRC screening completion (colonoscopy or fecal occult blood testing) within 12 months following enrollment. Multivariable association adjusted for race/ethnicity, language, and other sociodemographics was estimated using generalized estimating equations with logit link and binomial distribution. Results WFTS response was 70.3% (701). Most participants (83%) were Latino, Asian, or black. Most had income <$30,000 (96%) and public health insurance (86%). Higher trust in PCP was associated with screening completion (OR=1.11, 95% CI=1.03, 1.17), but trust in doctors was not (OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.82, 1.28). Race, language, and other sociodemographic factors were not significant in multivariable analysis. Conclusions After controlling for traditional factors, trust in PCP remained the only significant driver of CRC screening completion in low-income patients. Interventions to promote CRC screening may be improved by including efforts to enhance patient trust in PCP.

Expanding Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening: Benchmarking Quality Indicators in a Primary Care Colonoscopy Program

“…Incorporating colonoscopy into primary care practices may have the added benefit of ensuring continuity of care, decreasing costs to patients, and decreasing transportation barriers (including travel time). 40 Because a personal physician's recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening, [41][42][43][44] and trust in a primary care physician is also associated with CRC screening compliance, 13 primary care colonoscopy has great potential for decreasing CRC incidence and mortality. However, relatively few primary care physicians perform colonoscopies, 23 and only a fraction of family medicine residencies train residents to conduct colonoscopies.…”

How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review

“…Fifth, most narrative interventions in the studies were carried out in the United States, which means that the development process of narrative interventions reflects the access to health insurance and care provided in public and private systems. In addition, the focus in the United States is more on screening uptake rather than on informed decision making, through actively promoting the message “the best test is the one that gets done.” Hence, our synthesis provided more empirical evidence on the positive impact of narrative interventions in promoting screening uptake than on its influence on informed decision making.…”

Trust in Sources of Advice about Infant Care Practices: The SAFE Study

“…For adult patients, trust in medical providers, particularly physicians, is associated with increased adherence to health promoting behaviors such as improved self-care for patients with diabetes or sickle cell disease as well as increased screening for colorectal cancer [2][3][4]. Although studies for the pediatric population are not as numerous, the existing literature does demonstrate that for parents, trust in their children's medical providers, such as nurses and physicians, is associated with improved compliance with a number of health promoting behaviors [5,6].…”