Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities

Abstract

Background Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts. Objective The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. Search Strategy, Inclusion Criteria, Data Extraction and Synthesis We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data. Main Results We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were “respect” (n = 25, 45%) and “equitable power between all team members” (n = 21, 38%). Creating “trust between patient stakeholders and researchers” was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty‐seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders’ time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement. Discussion and Conclusions Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient‐centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers.

Engaging young African American women breast cancer survivors: A novel storytelling approach to identify patient‐centred research priorities

“…As concluded by the 2014 Institute of Medicine: ‘Prepared, engaged patients are a fundamental precursor to high‐quality care, lower costs and better health’ . In this study, we provide an example of how to actively engage patients and other stakeholders using established best practices, along with a novel storytelling approach . The engagement approaches including storytelling contribute to the literature on using innovative methods to address the knowledge‐to‐action gap between the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of patient engagement .…”

“…Second, patient stakeholders had the decision‐making power. A shared and collaborative decision‐making process was used throughout the entire project period to identify research priorities . We applied a multiple iteration approach that involved face‐to‐face meetings, workshops and a conference round table to prioritize the research topics.…”

“…Patients were compensated more based on their greater time commitment. Our reimbursement practice adhered to PCORI’s best practice on ‘compensation and reimbursement of out‐of‐pocket expenses’ …”

“…This approach was used in Henry Ford Health System (Detroit, Michigan, USA), which successfully led to the development of a set of patient‐centred comparative effectiveness research questions . Third, we apply key patient/stakeholder engagement principles and best practices from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) …”

A taxonomy of impacts on clinical and translational research from community stakeholder engagement

“… Other stakeholder engagement efforts are illustrative of the benefits of improving vocabulary around this topic. These include the following: stakeholder engagement frameworks and guidance not focused on community stakeholders specifically, a scaleable approach to patient engagement for patient‐centred outcomes research (PCOR), successful patient engagement for health‐care experiences and outcomes, and community engagement measures focused on partnership strength . Specifically evaluating community stakeholders' contributions to research, however, needs a framework specifically focused on characterizing and measuring community representative activities through the process of conceiving, conducing, analysing and reporting clinical and translational research.…”