2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-specific isogeometric structural analysis of aortic valve closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[49,47]). In the present work GUF finite element implementation includes linear, parabolic, cubic, and quartic triangular elements (see Fig.…”
Section: Implemented Triangular Elementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[49,47]). In the present work GUF finite element implementation includes linear, parabolic, cubic, and quartic triangular elements (see Fig.…”
Section: Implemented Triangular Elementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Current ways of performing personalization include estimation of fiber directions from imaging modalities such as diffusion MRI [178], as well as data assimilation of cardiac motion from imaging into electromechanics simulations through unscented Kalman filters [164,233]. Meanwhile, in the cardiac fluid dynamics community more and more advanced patient-specific valve models incorporating fluid-structure interaction are being developed [1,73,52,81,148,175,267], and may in the future be incorporated into full-heart computational models to study the joint effect of valve function and cardiac mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic IGA paradigm consists of adopting the same basis functions used for geometry representations in CAD systems -such as, e.g., Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) -for the approximation of field variables, in an isoparametric fashion. Thanks to the high-continuity properties of its basis functions, IGA is also characterized by an increased accuracy and robustness on a per-degree-of-freedom basis in comparison to standard FEA [3][4][5][6][7], and opens the door to new possibilities such as the construction of geometrically flexible discretizations of higher-order partial differential equations (PDEs) in primal form [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%