2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10124098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Printing Titanium Implant Biomechanical Evaluation for Complex Distal Femoral Open Fracture Reconstruction with Segmental Large Bone Defect: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis

Abstract: This study proposes a novel titanium 3D printing patient-specific implant: a lightweight structure with enough biomechanical strength for a distal femur fracture with segmental large defect using nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis. CT scanning images were processed to identify the size and shape of a large bone defect in the right distal femur of a young patient. A novel titanium implant was designed with a proximal cylinder tube for increasing mechanical stability, proximal/distal shells for increasing bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have combined CT imaging, CAD, FE analysis, and 3D printing to design implants for large defects in the supra-iliac spine [ 18 ], proximal tibia [ 19 ], and mandible [ 3 ], and for distal femur repair after traumatic injury [ 13 ]. However, these studies focused only on the implant design for a single case and did not generalize the design method or set rigorous design parameters to allow for applicability to other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have combined CT imaging, CAD, FE analysis, and 3D printing to design implants for large defects in the supra-iliac spine [ 18 ], proximal tibia [ 19 ], and mandible [ 3 ], and for distal femur repair after traumatic injury [ 13 ]. However, these studies focused only on the implant design for a single case and did not generalize the design method or set rigorous design parameters to allow for applicability to other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAD model of the femur/solid-core implant/implant screw/bone screw and bone plate system was imported into the computer-aided engineering analysis software (ANSYS, v19.0, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA) for FE analysis. The properties of the materials used in the model, including cortical bone, cancellous bone, Ti6Al4V implant, and bone nail/bone plate system, were assumed to have linear elastic property with homogeneous and isotropy and corresponding Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of different materials were assigned in the FE model ( Table 1 ) [ 13 ]. The free mesh method using a tetrahedron element was adopted to generate the FE mesh model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A valid option is to use dedicated medical software: in "Application of computer simulation in the treatment of traumatic cubitus varus deformity in children" [11] MIMICS is used for the simulation of osteotomy, in "Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty" [12] use is made of the Hip-PlanTM software (Symbios, Yverdon, Switzerland), which deals only with hip arthroplasty planning, while in "Integration of CAD/CAM planning into computer assisted orthopaedic surgery" [13] the model is transformed into three dimensions and customized bone prostheses are created for the patient via MIMICS software. Another interesting study is the one presented in the script of Wong et al (2020) [14], where a novel titanium 3D-printed patient-specific implant, starting from a model made with parametric software, is presented. Additionally, there is the paper of Milojevic et al (2010) [15] that performs a three-dimensional approximation of a femur from X-ray images to verify the exact position and measurements of the screws which are built-in in the human femur.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various finite element (FE) models have been developed to simulate human bones, particularly by extracting bone geometry from CT scans and correlating associated Hounsfield Unit (HU) values to bone material properties ( Bessho et al, 2007 ; Poelert et al, 2012 ; Basafa et al, 2013 ; Schermann et al, 2020 ), only a limited number of studies have employed finite element analysis to simulate the stiffness and behavior of bones implanted with 3D printed implants ( Wong et al, 2020 ; Yan et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2022 ). Notably, none of these studies have validated their simulation results with experimental data for implanted bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%