Patient-Sharing Relations in the Treatment of Diabetes and Their Implications for Health Information Exchange: Claims-Based Analysis

Abstract

Background Health information exchange (HIE) among care providers who cooperate in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) has been rated as an important aspect of successful care. Patient-sharing relations among care providers permit inferences about corresponding information-sharing relations. Objectives This study aimed to obtain information for an effective HIE platform design to be used in DM care by analyzing patient-sharing relations among various types of care providers (ToCPs), such as hospitals, pharmacies, and different outpatient specialists, within a nationwide claims dataset of Austrian DM patients. We focus on 2 parameters derived from patient-sharing networks: (1) the principal HIE partners of the different ToCPs involved in the treatment of DM and (2) the required participation rate of ToCPs in HIE platforms for the purpose of effective communication. Methods The claims data of 7.9 million Austrian patients from 2006 to 2007 served as our data source. DM patients were identified by their medication. We established metrics for the quantification of our 2 parameters of interest. The principal HIE partners were derived from the portions of a care provider’s patient-sharing relations with different ToCPs. For the required participation rate of ToCPs in an HIE platform, we determine the concentration of patient-sharing relations among ToCPs. Our corresponding metrics are derived in analogy from existing work for the quantification of the continuity of care. Results We identified 324,703 DM patients treated by 12,226 care providers; the latter were members of 16 ToCPs. On the basis of their score for 2 of our parameters, we categorized the ToCPs into low , medium , and high . For the most important HIE partner parameter, pharmacies, general practitioners (GPs), and laboratories were the representatives of the top group, that is, our care providers shared the highest numbers of DM patients with these ToCPs. For the required participation rate of type of care provide (ToCP) in HIE platform parameter, the concentration of DM patient-sharing relations with a ToCP tended to be inversely related to the ToCPs member count. Conclusions We conclude that GPs, pharmacies, and laboratories should be core members of any HIE platform that supports DM care, as they are the most important DM patient-sharing partners. We further conclude that, for implementing HIE with ToCPs who have many members (in Austria, particularly GPs and pharmacies), an HIE solution with high participation rates from these ToCPs (ideally a nationwide HIE platform with obligatory participation of the concerned ToCPs) seems essential. This will raise the probability of HIE being achieved with any care provider of these ToCPs. As chronic diseases are rising because of a...

Quantification of the resilience of primary care networks by stress testing the health care system

“…A web-based interactive visualization of a simplified version of the model on a real regional primary care network is available online (https://csh.ac.at/vis/med_public/pcn-resilience) ( SI Appendix , Text S8). Structural properties of these patient-sharing networks have been reported previously (11–14).…”

“…These systems enable analysts to answer questions, such as “Who did what, when, for whom, where and at what costs?,” for practically all medical services in a given country. For instance, in Austria, it has been shown that such data can be used to identify genetic, environmental, and epigenetic disease risks (9, 10) or to investigate how individual health care providers coordinate with each other in the treatment of patients (11–14). Health care providers are embedded in multiple formal and informal relationships, because they share information or patients.…”

Electronic Health Records as Valuable Data Sources in the Health Care Quality Improvement Process

“…Previous studies have shown that it is possible to observe the area-level differences or differences by service provider in processes and quality of care by comparing data from EHRs. 9 -12 Data are especially useful when explanatory factors other than health care processes (such as demographic determinants) can be taken into account. Further, the possibility to indicate the changes in processes using health record data from different years is valuable.…”

Stress-testing the Resilience of the Austrian Healthcare System Using Agent-Based Simulation

“…It was recently shown that indicators such as the density of care providers fall short of capturing structural barriers to health care that arise from the fact that patients do not access physicians at random 4 . Rather, physicians are embedded in informal and emergent networks of flows of patients between them [5][6][7][8][9][10] . These networks might, for instance, emerge because of geographic proximity, of one physician tending to recommend another one, or due to physicians acting as holiday substitutes to each other, and thereby encode how likely a patient will access a given care provider given that s/he has already accessed a specific other one.…”