2014
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient self‐assessment of chronic wounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where visual evidence is not available, ulcer validation will be supported by key questions regarding wound characteristics, such as location and duration. Moreover, there are data supporting the ability of patients to correctly self-assess the status of their chronic wounds with up to 97% accuracy when compared with expert evaluation 27…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where visual evidence is not available, ulcer validation will be supported by key questions regarding wound characteristics, such as location and duration. Moreover, there are data supporting the ability of patients to correctly self-assess the status of their chronic wounds with up to 97% accuracy when compared with expert evaluation 27…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While patients who thought their wounds were open were correct nearly 97% of the time, those who thought their wounds had healed were correct in only 42% of all instances. 8 This data suggested that patients are, indeed, unlikely to accurately assess their chronic wounds. While the results of our study are based on a nonvalidated questionnaire, the question is of "face value" and undoubtedly exposes a gap in patients' knowledge of acute wound healing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%