2017
DOI: 10.33546/bnj.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PATIENT SATISFACTION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE QUALITY OF COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY OBSTETRIC AND NEONATAL CARE (CEmONC) IN THE GENERAL HOSPITAL OF PANEMBAHAN SENOPATI BANTUL

Abstract: Background: Patient satisfaction has emerged as an increasingly important health outcome and is currently used to evaluate the quality of care.Objective: To describe the level of satisfaction of mothers post-caesaren section and examine its relationship with the quality of Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care (CEmONC).Methods: This was an analytic descriptive study using cross-sectional design. The study was conducted in Alamanda ward in the General Hospital (RSUD) of Panembahan Senopati Bantul … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of maternal satisfaction with EmONC services in Ethiopia was 63.15% (95% CI: 49.48–76.82). This finding is in line with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted in Pakistan and Indonesia in which the pooled prevalence was 63% 35 and 56.4%, 36 respectively. This variation might be a result of differences in the level of quality service offered, an increased awareness of maternity care services, a change in mothers’ expectations, or the type of health facilities offering the delivery services.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of maternal satisfaction with EmONC services in Ethiopia was 63.15% (95% CI: 49.48–76.82). This finding is in line with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted in Pakistan and Indonesia in which the pooled prevalence was 63% 35 and 56.4%, 36 respectively. This variation might be a result of differences in the level of quality service offered, an increased awareness of maternity care services, a change in mothers’ expectations, or the type of health facilities offering the delivery services.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%