2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211877
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: This systematic review aims to summarise available patient-reported questionnaires to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that can be utilised by healthcare professionals in clinical practice and to summarise the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of the questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and Emcare databases to screen for articles published between January 2000 and July 2020. Data items regarding va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial content for the SideRep system was primarily based on findings from our systematic review. Detailed findings of the review has been published elsewhere [ 21 ]. Of the 19 questionnaires identified, 15 were for a specific condition or medication, and 4 were general questionnaires applicable to any medication [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initial content for the SideRep system was primarily based on findings from our systematic review. Detailed findings of the review has been published elsewhere [ 21 ]. Of the 19 questionnaires identified, 15 were for a specific condition or medication, and 4 were general questionnaires applicable to any medication [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed findings of the review has been published elsewhere [ 21 ]. Of the 19 questionnaires identified, 15 were for a specific condition or medication, and 4 were general questionnaires applicable to any medication [ 21 ]. Two of the generic questionnaires, developed by Jarensiripornkul et al [ 24 ] and de Vries et al [ 25 ], were considered the most relevant for our study objective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reasons for missed dosages, adverse effects, symptom improvement, and other clinically related information were also documented in a specific questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed based on the Patient-Reported Adverse Drug Event Questionnaire and the Generic Symptoms Questionnaire [18]. The questionnaire was mainly check-list based, which was believed to be more sensitive in determining adverse effects.…”
Section: Outcome Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was an error in the original publication [ 1 ]. We stated that none of the questionnaires included information on how long it took to complete, which is incorrect.…”
Section: Text Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%