2020
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient‐Reported Outcomes of Metal and Acrylic Resin Removable Partial Dentures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abstract: PurposeMetal removable partial dentures (RPDs) are often considered long‐term treatment options for partially edentulous patients, while acrylic resin RPDs are considered interim treatments. The aim of this review was to compare metal and acrylic resin RPDs regarding patient‐reported outcomes for partially edentulous individuals.Materials and MethodsFour databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well as being easier to break, they are also easier to repair than a skeletonized prosthesis [ 3 ]. A skeletonized prosthesis is recommended because it is aesthetically valid and to obviate the disadvantage of breaking the prosthesis; and, from the point of view of satisfaction, removable metal prostheses have a higher degree of approval in partially edentulous patients [ 4 ]. In the case of upper and lower total prosthesis, the breakage event is more evident for the lower prosthesis as its horseshoe design creates greater tension and, therefore, fragility in the center of the prosthesis in the fifth sextant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as being easier to break, they are also easier to repair than a skeletonized prosthesis [ 3 ]. A skeletonized prosthesis is recommended because it is aesthetically valid and to obviate the disadvantage of breaking the prosthesis; and, from the point of view of satisfaction, removable metal prostheses have a higher degree of approval in partially edentulous patients [ 4 ]. In the case of upper and lower total prosthesis, the breakage event is more evident for the lower prosthesis as its horseshoe design creates greater tension and, therefore, fragility in the center of the prosthesis in the fifth sextant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most frequently applied questionnaires is the visual analogue scale (VAS), as it represents a generic, multidimensional, and easily understandable instrument. However, PROs for RPD wearers have rarely been evaluated [ 21 , 22 ]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is only one study available reporting on PROMs in D-RPDs with precious metal alloy primary crowns [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial edentulism is common in several populations and countries 1 and depending on its presentation, may require prosthodontic treatment 2 . Several treatment modalities are available to treat partial edentulism with different reported oral health‐related quality of life and other patient‐reported outcomes 3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Several treatment modalities are available to treat partial edentulism with different reported oral health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes. 3 Among the treatment modalities, removable partial dentures (RPDs) have long been considered a viable and affordable treatment option, though with varying degrees of patient compliance for prosthesis wearing. 4 The association between the use of RPDs and gingivitis and periodontitis has been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%