2019
DOI: 10.1177/0163278719856406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery

Abstract: The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans underg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Universal rather than diseases specific. Provides a patient perspective on the extent to which pain interferes in activities of daily living Pain-related functioning Good to excellent Internal Consistency (Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.93 to 0.96) strong to very strong construct validity (r = 0.69 to 0.76) with PROMIS Anxiety Short Form and PROMIS Depression Short Form 60 Notes: a Interpretation of ICC values: ICC˂0.5=poor, 0.5≤ICC˂0.75=moderate, 0.75≤ICC˂0.9=good, and ICC≥0.90=excellent. 61 bInterpretation of α values: α˂0.5 = unacceptable; 0.5≤α˂0.6=poor; 0.6≤α˂0.7= questionable; 0.7≤α˂0.8=acceptable; 0.8≤α˂0.9=good; α≥0.9=excellent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal rather than diseases specific. Provides a patient perspective on the extent to which pain interferes in activities of daily living Pain-related functioning Good to excellent Internal Consistency (Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.93 to 0.96) strong to very strong construct validity (r = 0.69 to 0.76) with PROMIS Anxiety Short Form and PROMIS Depression Short Form 60 Notes: a Interpretation of ICC values: ICC˂0.5=poor, 0.5≤ICC˂0.75=moderate, 0.75≤ICC˂0.9=good, and ICC≥0.90=excellent. 61 bInterpretation of α values: α˂0.5 = unacceptable; 0.5≤α˂0.6=poor; 0.6≤α˂0.7= questionable; 0.7≤α˂0.8=acceptable; 0.8≤α˂0.9=good; α≥0.9=excellent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency was found to be 0.92 to 0.97, with test‐retest correlations at 0.82 to 0.83 (104–106). In SLE, good test‐retest agreement was found for the majority of domains, including anxiety (intraclass correlation coefficient [2;1] 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.51‐0.84) (107).…”
Section: Patient‐reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systemmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Classical test theory (CTT) is a commonly used measurement framework that assumes the true score cannot be directly observed and can only be assessed indirectly through the observed test score with error (Allen & Yen, 2001). PROMIS ® anxiety measures have been tested using CTT and demonstrated validity and reliability in adult populations with different conditions, including patients with osteoarthritis (Driban et al, 2015; Lee et al, 2017), multiple sclerosis (Marrie et al, 2018), lumbar degenerative disease (Purvis et al, 2018), and orthopedic conditions (Beleckas et al, 2018; Hadlandsmyth et al, 2020). While reliability and validity of different anxiety short forms are highly similar, the longest short form (8a) is recommended for use to achieve the most precise measure and the shortest form (4a) is recommended for use when there is little room for additional measures to capture anxiety as a secondary outcome (National Institute of Health, 2019).…”
Section: Promis® Anxiety Short Forms Vs Generalized Anxiety Disorder ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GAD-7 showed evidence for unidimensionality and decent fit to IRT models in primary care patients (Jordan et al, 2017). In addition, the GAD-7 has been tested using CCT with established reliability and validity in different adult patient populations using CTT, including patients following coronary artery bypass surgery (Tully & Baker, 2012), orthopedic surgery (Hadlandsmyth et al, 2020), and patients with chronic depression (Toussaint et al, 2020), anxiety, and mood disorders (Rutter & Brown, 2017).…”
Section: Promis® Anxiety Short Forms Vs Generalized Anxiety Disorder ...mentioning
confidence: 99%