2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz265.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported outcomes associated with switching to rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The COSIMO study previously demonstrated that patients with CAT who change their VTE treatment from LMWH, fondaparinux, or a VKA to rivaroxaban in everyday clinical practice experience an improvement in treatment satisfaction. 22 In the current analysis, this study also provided insights into the types of patients selected for and who chose rivaroxaban treatment in routine clinical practice, and associated clinical outcomes. Patients were recruited sequentially, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were minimal; this allowed for insights into the benefit‐risk profile of rivaroxaban across a range of patients with active cancer who have been considered suitable for rivaroxaban by treating physicians, including patients differing from those enrolled in previous RCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The COSIMO study previously demonstrated that patients with CAT who change their VTE treatment from LMWH, fondaparinux, or a VKA to rivaroxaban in everyday clinical practice experience an improvement in treatment satisfaction. 22 In the current analysis, this study also provided insights into the types of patients selected for and who chose rivaroxaban treatment in routine clinical practice, and associated clinical outcomes. Patients were recruited sequentially, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were minimal; this allowed for insights into the benefit‐risk profile of rivaroxaban across a range of patients with active cancer who have been considered suitable for rivaroxaban by treating physicians, including patients differing from those enrolled in previous RCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of the COSIMO study have been previously described. 21 , 22 COSIMO was a single‐arm study, and although a comparator intervention might have provided further clinical perspective, a two‐armed noninterventional study would have required propensity score adjustment to address the high levels of heterogeneity in populations of patients with CAT; the larger sample size required for this may have been complicated by recruitment and retention challenges. 33 Because the study was limited to patients switching to rivaroxaban, the possibility of bias according to DOAC selection cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events across several indications, including VTE. The direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban (and to a lesser extent the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran) have been investigated in studies of the prevention [6][7][8] and treatment [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] of VTE in patients with cancer; results from many of these studies are now published. 6,7,[9][10][11] This review details the rationale, study designs, and results (where applicable) of completed and ongoing investigations of DOACs in CAT, with a focus on rivaroxaban and the studies in the CALLISTO (Cancer Associated thrombosis-expLoring soLutions for patients through Treatment and Prevention with RivarOxaban) program (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was a change in the ACTS Burdens score at week 4 compared with baseline. Patients with CAT reported a durable improvement in anticoagulation-associated treatment satisfaction, specifically a reduction in the perceived burdens of therapy, following the change to rivaroxaban 12. As part of this study, a discrete choice experiment was presented to patients, who were asked to decide between completely hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of different attributes (route of administration [injection/tablet], frequency of intake [once daily/ twice daily], need for regular assessment of international normalized ratio at least every 3-4 weeks [yes/no], and interactions with food/alcohol [yes/no]), regardless of efficacy or safety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%