2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in PMM2-CDG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotional problems and depression were not found to be relevant problems by any of the screening tools. These ndings differ from those reported by Ligezka et al [32]. However, remarkably, a subset of patients with absence of lipodystrophy showed a statistically signi cantly correlation to an increase in the existence of signi cant "Withdrawn/depressed" and also "Affective problems".…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Emotional problems and depression were not found to be relevant problems by any of the screening tools. These ndings differ from those reported by Ligezka et al [32]. However, remarkably, a subset of patients with absence of lipodystrophy showed a statistically signi cantly correlation to an increase in the existence of signi cant "Withdrawn/depressed" and also "Affective problems".…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, collecting patient-reported outcomes and quality of life data would be extremely important to have a holistic perspective on the disease’s impact, particularly in terms of immunological episodes. Namely, in PMM2-CDG, some tools have been pinpointed ( 220 , 221 ).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some general patient-reported clinical assessment tools have already been used in clinics for PMM2-CDG, particularly the Goal Attainment Scale and the patient-centred measures from Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) [ 32 , 33 ]. However, none of these reflect the most impactful conditions presented by the patients.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, we believe that the over or underestimation of QoL from proxies can be systematic and therefore, changes across time and following an intervention should be captured. Measuring clinical severity alongside proxy-reports might be a way to ensure their reliability [ 33 ]. However, we cannot discard that a minority of PMM2-CDG patients might be able to express themselves and provide QoL self-ratings.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%