2021
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Fibula Free Flap Harvest: A Pilot Study

Abstract: Summary: Patient-reported outcomes regarding donor-site morbidity and quality of life for the fibula free flap in head and neck reconstruction patients have not been studied. The authors reviewed and identified patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction using a fibula free flap (2011 to 2016). Patients were assessed via physical examination and two patient-reported outcomes questionnaires: the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (score range, 0 to 100) and the Pain Disability Questionnaire (score range, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[35][36][37] Although this article focused primarily on DASH results for upper trunk free flaps, other studies have utilized lower-extremity-specific PROMs such as the Lower Limb Core Scale 38 or Foot and Ankle Outcome Score 39 to assess lower extremity flaps such as the fibular free flap (FFF). [40][41][42] Future studies using standardized PROMs across donor sites are necessary to enable surgeons to compare the morbidity of upper and lower extremity flaps and accurately tailor donor site selection to patient function, lifestyle, and hobbies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37] Although this article focused primarily on DASH results for upper trunk free flaps, other studies have utilized lower-extremity-specific PROMs such as the Lower Limb Core Scale 38 or Foot and Ankle Outcome Score 39 to assess lower extremity flaps such as the fibular free flap (FFF). [40][41][42] Future studies using standardized PROMs across donor sites are necessary to enable surgeons to compare the morbidity of upper and lower extremity flaps and accurately tailor donor site selection to patient function, lifestyle, and hobbies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a patient-reported questionnaire rather than objective instrumental analysis because patient-reported outcomes can more accurately reveal the level of discomfort and impact of donor-site morbidities on patients' daily lives. 15,16 The questionnaire that we use evaluates five distinct domains of donor-site complications. In the pain/sensory domain, 4 (4/39; 10.3%) of the patients reported mild pain (occasional and not intense) after at least 1 year of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications related to the donor site following free fibula flap harvests are frequently attributed to delayed wound healing during the early phase of the postoperative course. However, chronic pain and/or gait disturbances have been reported as a result of donor site complications in the long-term [13][14][15][16]. The risk of serious complications following an ischemic event is rare [7,8,17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free fibula flaps have earned a stellar reputation; however, they do not always disclose significant donor site complications that may complicate the surgery. Various studies have revealed that chronic ankle pain and mobility issues can be unpredictable and potentially debilitating [13][14][15][16]. In contrast, compartment syndrome and vascular ischemia are not often mentioned in the literature, but their occurrence is possibly preventable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%