2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because many patients experience disease progression or death early in the course of therapy due to the highly aggressive disease nature and leave the study. A recent systemic review of patient reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer revealed that questionnaire completion rates fell below 10% of the original cohort within 12 months in patients with unresectable stage (compared to 75% in patients with resectable stage) 24 . For this reason and also because there is no gold standard for handling missing data in variance analysis, we chose the parameter of time to definitive deterioration of GHS/QOL by 5% as the primary end point of the QoL analysis following the methodology described by Awad et al 1 Because a definitive deterioration can often be captured before a patient's deterioration in physical status affects compliance, this methodology is less affected by missing data than the classical repeated measures analysis of variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because many patients experience disease progression or death early in the course of therapy due to the highly aggressive disease nature and leave the study. A recent systemic review of patient reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer revealed that questionnaire completion rates fell below 10% of the original cohort within 12 months in patients with unresectable stage (compared to 75% in patients with resectable stage) 24 . For this reason and also because there is no gold standard for handling missing data in variance analysis, we chose the parameter of time to definitive deterioration of GHS/QOL by 5% as the primary end point of the QoL analysis following the methodology described by Awad et al 1 Because a definitive deterioration can often be captured before a patient's deterioration in physical status affects compliance, this methodology is less affected by missing data than the classical repeated measures analysis of variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review on PROs and PDAC identified only 170 studies employing PROMs in PDAC patients. 99 …”
Section: A Patient‐centered View Of Pancreatic Cancer Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the number of studies investigating PROs in advanced disease, especially beyond 12 months of disease is extremely limited, urging more investigation in this field, as the introduction of more effective intensified chemotherapy regimens is likely to guarantee a longer life expectancy for many patients. 99 …”
Section: A Patient‐centered View Of Pancreatic Cancer Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a 5-year survival rate of 9%, it is usually detected at advanced stages and has limited therapeutic options [2]. PDAC exhibits the characteristics of extensive desmoplasia, rapid metastasis, and advanced resistance to chemotherapy and radiation, rendering this disease a major priority for public health care [3]. One of the main reasons for such poor prognosis is the limited understanding of molecular mechanisms of PDAC progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%