2022
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores in Pediatric Idiopathic Toe Walkers

Abstract: Background: Idiopathic toe walking (ITW) can result in early contact with the health care system and be distressing for patients and their families. The natural history of ITW is poorly characterized. Deciding how and when to intervene can be difficult. Patient-reported outcomes are utilized in the clinical setting to assess patient factors and indications that may better inform treatment plans. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is an instrument designed to collect patient-repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite existing literature favouring range of motion as the primary outcome when exploring ITW, functional issues were considered a key indicator for all four interventions for ITW by respondents to our survey and the importance of functional impact was also highlighted within qualitative responses. This reflects growing evidence of the impact ITW in childhood has on long term quality of life and social / functional outcomes and would be an important factor to consider in future research [25,26] Qualitative data highlighted ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the natural history of toe-walking gait in a healthy population and how physical, and social impacts of the gait pattern changes over time [8]. Interpretation of current evidence on natural history appears to influence decision making and treatment planning for children who exhibit ITW in the UK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Despite existing literature favouring range of motion as the primary outcome when exploring ITW, functional issues were considered a key indicator for all four interventions for ITW by respondents to our survey and the importance of functional impact was also highlighted within qualitative responses. This reflects growing evidence of the impact ITW in childhood has on long term quality of life and social / functional outcomes and would be an important factor to consider in future research [25,26] Qualitative data highlighted ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the natural history of toe-walking gait in a healthy population and how physical, and social impacts of the gait pattern changes over time [8]. Interpretation of current evidence on natural history appears to influence decision making and treatment planning for children who exhibit ITW in the UK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…With a median physical domain score of 54%, the ITW group seemingly has greater impairment than several other foot and ankle disorders, including surgically managed clubfeet (median: 75%), Ponseti managed clubfeet (median: 91.7%), and flexible flatfeet (mean: 64%). 14,15 In a recent retrospective study of 45 children with ITW, Lindsay et al 16 utilized the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System to demonstrate impairments in mobility and peer relationship domains compared with a health age-matched population. This in part echoes the impairments seen in the OxAFQ_C domains adding further weight to the argument that ITW is not an entirely benign presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent retrospective study of 45 children with ITW, Lindsay et al 16 utilized the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System to demonstrate impairments in mobility and peer relationship domains compared with a health age-matched population. This in part echoes the impairments seen in the OxAFQ_C domains adding further weight to the argument that ITW is not an entirely benign presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%