Patient-Related Risk Factors for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review

Leung, Martin; Alghamdi, Reem; Guallart, InËs Fernandez; Bergamini, Marco; Yu, Paul Yc; Froum, Stuart J.; Cho, Sang-Choon

doi:10.11607/prd.5265

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the results of the present study did not show any statistically significant differences between the groups, the finding that sinus lift techniques might involve a higher inherent risk of complications could be considered as one of the parameters of treatment choice [7].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

“…To allow patients to receive fixed rehabilitations, several therapeutic alternatives such as bone grafting and sinus lift techniques have been proposed to increase residual bone height; although these procedures have provided good long-term results [4,5], several complications, including Schneider's membrane perforation, grafted material infection and/or resorption, implant dislocation in the maxillary sinus, acute or chronic sinusitis, alveolo-antral artery injury, and benign paroxysmal vertigo, could occur [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tilted Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques Compared in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Clinical Study over Four Years of Follow-Up

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and surgical and prosthetic complications of implants placed through sinus floor elevation and tilted implants engaged in basal bone to bypass the maxillary sinus. Sixty patients were enrolled for this study. According to the residual bone height of the posterior maxilla, the sample was divided into three groups of 20 patients: Group A (lateral sinus floor elevation), Group B (transcrestal sinus floor elevation), and Group C (tilted implants employed to bypass the sinus floor). Follow-up visits were performed one week after surgery, at three and six months, and then once a year for the next 4 years. The outcomes were the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and surgical and prosthetic complications. Although Groups A, B, and C demonstrated implant survival rates of 83.3%, 86.7%, and 98.3%, respectively, the statistical analysis showed no statistically significant difference between groups. Statistically significant differences between groups were also not found concerning marginal bone loss, as recorded by intra-oral X-ray measurements during follow-up examinations. Regarding complications, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis. To reduce possible surgical risks, implant placement in basal bone could be preferred.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tilted Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques Compared in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Clinical Study over Four Years of Follow-Up

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although bone grafting and sinus lift techniques have provided good long-term results [4] [5], several complications including Schneider's membrane perforation, grafted material's infection or resorption, implants' dislocation in maxillary sinus, acute or chronic sinusitis, alveolo-antral artery injury and benign paroxysmal vertigo, could occur [6] [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, considering the risk of intra-and post-operative complications [7], inclined implants could be preferred, provided the following conditions are achieved: adequate bone volume in the retrocanine area for implant placement at least 10-mm long and combination with an axial implant [19] [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tilted Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques Compared in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla: Retrospective Clinical Study of Four Years Follow-up

Felice¹,

D'orto²,

Nagni³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate implants survival rate, marginal bone loss, surgical and prosthetic complications of implants placed through sinus floor elevation and tilted implants en-gaged in basal bone in order to bypass maxillary sinus. 60 patients were enrolled for this study. According with residual bone height of posterior maxilla the sample was divided in three groups of 20 patients: Group A (lateral sinus floor elevation), Group B (transrectal sinus floor elevation) and Group C (tilted implants employed to bypass sinus floor). Follow-up visits were performed one week after surgery, at 3, 6 months and then once a year for next 4 years. The outcomes were implants survival rate, marginal bone loss and surgical and prosthetic complications. Although the Group A, B and C have demonstrated an implants survival rate of 83.3%, 86,7% and 98,3% respectively, the statistically analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Statistically significant differences between the groups were also not found con-cerning marginal bone loss, as recorded by intra-oral X-ray measurements during follow-up. About complications it wasn’t possible to perform a statistical analysis. To as to reduce potential surgical risks implants placement in basal bone should be preferred.

show abstract

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

Cagna

Donovan

McKee³

et al. 2022

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient-Related Risk Factors for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review

Cited by 9 publications

References 24 publications

Tilted Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques Compared in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Clinical Study over Four Years of Follow-Up

Tilted Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques Compared in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Clinical Study over Four Years of Follow-Up

Tilted Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques Compared in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla: Retrospective Clinical Study of Four Years Follow-up

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About