Patient Provider Communication and Reproductive Health

Knapp, Caprice; Quinn, Gwendolyn P.; Rapalo, Deborah M.; Woodworth, Lindsey

doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2492-1_14

Cited by 11 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinical practice guidelines are intended to guide health‐care professionals and patient decisions regarding appropriate, safe, and cost‐effective fertility care for women who desire biological children after a cancer diagnosis, 56 describing available fertility preservation techniques and determine their appropriateness 18 . Although there are inconsistencies and variability in fertility preservation recommendations among different guidelines 57 ; collectively, these guidelines acknowledge fertility care as an important component of cancer management for young patients and the need for fertility discussions between health‐care professionals and the young patient before cancer treatment begins.…”

Section: Fertility Decisions—vital Role Of Information Provisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence‐based informational resources

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Fertility Decisions—vital Role Of Information Provisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence‐based informational resources

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is stressed that every pregnant woman is entitled to high-quality, person-centred, safe, and effective healthcare (Crowe & Manley, 2019). Moreover, studies worldwide have highlighted the importance of appropriate patient-provider communication and its impacts on pregnancy care (Knapp et al, 2011; Kozhimannil et al, 2015; Lerman et al, 2007). However, the lack of synthesised data on women’s experiences engaging and interacting with healthcare providers through ANC in England is a concerning gap in the literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining Effective Patient-Provider Communication in Antenatal Settings across England: An In-Depth Analysis of Woman’s Experiences

Andrzejczak,

Jones,

Nye

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Pregnancy requires appropriate guidance and support from healthcare professionals. Understanding womens experiences of effective patient-provider communication through antenatal care is critical, as evidence suggests, inadequate communication could pose various risks to maternal and neonatal well-being. Despite efforts to modernise maternity services, recent assessments reveal persistent challenges, with nearly half of maternity services inspections categorised as inadequate or requires improvement. This qualitative systematic review investigated effective patient-provider communication in antenatal care settings across England, contributing essential insights into womens experiences and feelings from various backgrounds. Methods This study utilised the PICo framework to formulate the research question, focusing on effective patient-provider communication in antenatal care settings across England. A comprehensive search involving various study types was conducted across electronic databases from 2010 onwards. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predefined, and relevant studies underwent thorough screening. Data synthesis involved a qualitative descriptive approach, employing thematic analysis to capture diverse experiences. Findings were summarised through coded extracts, supporting quotes, and a narrative addressing womens experiences. Results The search identified 46 records, with six studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Results were synthesised utilising thematic analysis approach. Subsequently, five themes were distinguished: Responsive and engaging communication; Individualised treatment; Clear presentation of service information and informed choice; Continuity of care; and Additional ways of communication. The study identified key suggestions to improve patient-provider communication in antenatal care, including tailored training programmes aimed at HCPs focusing on empathy, active listening, building emotional connections, establishing trust, and providing continuity of care. Recommendations also emphasise transparent information and empowering women through communication. Likewise, suggestions extend to the incorporation of cultural safety training initiatives and addressing structural issues within the system. The study, however featured experiences of minority ethnic women, which may potentially impact results, limiting the findings generalisability. In addition, measuring womens views amid the emotional intensity associated with pregnancy presents inherent challenges, hypothetically affecting the depth of understanding of the experiences. Conclusion Few key conclusions derived from women experiences highlight the need to re-address barriers to communication. Proposed strategies offer practical steps, but further research is urged to address emerging challenges by advocating for improved communication strategies in order to enhance prenatal care nationally.

show abstract

Fertility Communication to Cancer Patients: A Hematologist–Oncologist’s Perspective

Giordano

2013

Oncofertility Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient Provider Communication and Reproductive Health

Cited by 11 publications

References 27 publications

Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence‐based informational resources

Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence‐based informational resources

Examining Effective Patient-Provider Communication in Antenatal Settings across England: An In-Depth Analysis of Woman’s Experiences

Fertility Communication to Cancer Patients: A Hematologist–Oncologist’s Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About