2001
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Preferences Versus Physician Perceptions of Treatment Decisions in Cancer Care

Abstract: An individual approach is needed and each patient should be assessed prospectively for DMP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
222
2
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
222
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The patients' expectations also depend on the type of the disease, 15,20 or the type of the malignancy. 13,15,19,25 Most of the literature data on the attitude of breast cancer patients towards being informed, and participation in treatment decision come from Canada, 15,17,18,26,32 the US, 7,10,25,[27][28][29][30][31]34 Australia, 6,9,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The patients' expectations also depend on the type of the disease, 15,20 or the type of the malignancy. 13,15,19,25 Most of the literature data on the attitude of breast cancer patients towards being informed, and participation in treatment decision come from Canada, 15,17,18,26,32 the US, 7,10,25,[27][28][29][30][31]34 Australia, 6,9,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 At the same time our data confirm the commendations that for the optimal result, an interacting consultation with a permanent monitoring of the needs of the individual patient is required. 10,11,27,28,31,32 The attitude of breast cancer patients toward the disease and the treatment may vary in different countries. It is mandatory to apply such practice that optimally meets their real requirements and preferences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is different from the process in which preferences are elicited using a time tradeoff or standard gamble approach to assess health states (utilities), commonly used in macrolevel decision analysis, economic evaluations, and some patient decision aids [46]. Patient preferences cannot often be predicted and do not always correlate with sociodemographic variables like age or gender [47], so eliciting individual preferences provides the only reliable method of understanding individual values that can influence decisions. In addition, patients might not have previously formed preferences about cancer decisions because they find themselves in a new, emotional situation [4,20,48].…”
Section: The Process Of Shared Decision Making In Oncology Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degner et al reportaron una concordancia de 42% entre las preferencias en el estilo de toma de decisiones y experiencia real de 1.012 mujeres con cáncer de mama 13. En un estudio posterior, Bruera encontró una concordancia de 45% entre las preferencias en toma de decisiones y percepción de los médicos sobre éstas 14 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified