Patient preferences for participation in patient care and safety activities in hospitals

Abstract

BackgroundActive patient participation is a patient safety priority for health care. Yet, patients and their preferences are less understood. The aim of the study was to explore hospitalised patients’ preferences on participation in their care and safety activities in Sweden.MethodsExploratory qualitative study. Data were collected over a four-month period in 2013 and 2014. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients who were admitted to one of four medical wards at a university hospital in Sweden. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsNine men and eleven women, whose median age was 72 years (range 22–89), were included in the study. Five themes emerged with the thematic analysis: endorsing participation; understanding enables participation; enacting patient safety by participation; impediments to participation; and the significance of participation. This study demonstrated that patients wanted to be active participants in their care and safety activities by having a voice and being a part of the decision-making process, sharing information and possessing knowledge about their conditions. These factors were all enablers for patient participation. However, a number of barriers hampered participation, such as power imbalances, lack of patient acuity and patient uncertainty. Patients’ participation in care and patient safety activities seemed to determine whether patients were feeling safe or ignored.ConclusionThis study contributes to the existing literature with fundamental evidence of patients’ willingness to participate in care and safety activities. Promoting patient participation begins by understanding the patients’ unique preferences and needs for care, establishing a good relationship and paying attention to each patient’s ability to participate despite their illness.

Matching actual treatment with patient administration-route-preference improves analgesic response among acute low back pain patients—a randomized prospective trial

“…The findings of our current study support previously published data that treatment based on patient preference improves therapeutic and analgesic outcomes [20,26,27] and adds the administration route preference as an additional consideration for the practitioner when prescribing analgesic treatment.…”

Exploring the barriers to patient engagement in the delivery of safe care in Iranian hospitals: A qualitative study

“…A review of existing literature reveals that whilst studies examining patient engagement in patient safety have been conducted in developed countries (Martin, Navne, & Lipczak, ;Ringdal, Chaboyer, Ulin, Bucknall, & Oxelmark, ;Skagerstrom, Ericsson, Nilsen, Ekstedt, & Schildmeijer, ), and there is a lack of evidence from developing countries. In developing countries, improvements in levels of patient safety require a holistic approach that has a clear vision emanating from the political leadership and which, above all, puts patients at the centre of the care process (Elmontsri, Banarsee, & Majeed, ).…”

Patient participation in patient safety-An exploration of promoting factors

“…This trend is reflected in increased frequency of patient participation (PP) in developing safety procedures for their care, and in the promotion of patient safety (PS) in health care (NHS, ). Patient participation and patients’ views on PS are important for efficient identification of effective interventions for promotion of safe care (Ringdahl, Chaboyer, Ulin, Bucknall, & Oxelmark, ). Improving safety requires an organisational culture that enables and prioritizes safety and, above all, a commitment to safety at all organisational levels from frontline workers to managers and executives (Fisher, Jones, & Verran, ; Thornton et al, ).…”

“…Multiple factors, such as patient-related, health care worker (HCW)-related, organisation-related and society-related factors, influence patients' opportunities, willingness, and ability to participate to a given degree and at a given level (e.g., Bishop, Baker, Boyle, & MacKinnon, 2015;Davis, Vincent, & Sevdalis, 2015;Ringdahl et al, 2017;Sutton, Eborall, & Martin, 2015). Little is known about the factors that explain a patient's decision to participate (Davis et al, 2015).…”