2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9217-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient preferences and National Health Service costs: a cost-consequences analysis of cancer genetic services

Abstract: The study has three aims; firstly to establish if, having been informed of their risk status and that gene testing is inappropriate for them, low and moderate risk patients have misunderstood or failed to grasp this and want a test that is inappropriate for them. Secondly, to elicit patients' willingness to pay for cancer genetic services. Thirdly, to ascertain the aspects of cancer genetics services that are important to high risk patients and present service configurations prioritised in terms of preferences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of patients who chose to do genetic testing, 52% were ineligible for subsidy and willingly paid the cost of testing entirely out-of-pocket. In the UK, patients were willing to pay up to £3000 (S$5565) for genetic services 27. This is consistent with prior research that revealed individuals of higher socioeconomic status who seek cancer risk assessment have strong intentions to undergo genetic testing, and that intention is associated with perceived risk of developing cancer, benefits of preventive screening and control over cancer risks 28.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Of patients who chose to do genetic testing, 52% were ineligible for subsidy and willingly paid the cost of testing entirely out-of-pocket. In the UK, patients were willing to pay up to £3000 (S$5565) for genetic services 27. This is consistent with prior research that revealed individuals of higher socioeconomic status who seek cancer risk assessment have strong intentions to undergo genetic testing, and that intention is associated with perceived risk of developing cancer, benefits of preventive screening and control over cancer risks 28.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…40 In contrast to samples of adults from the general population in the US and in Canada, patients at low, medium, and high risk for breast cancer in Great Britain would pay up to 3,000 pounds sterling (approximately $4,850) for genetic testing, a value above the cost of testing to the National Health Plan. 41 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients at all risk levels indicated willingness to pay up to GBP 3,000, an amount that exceeds the actual cost of providing such services through the publicly funded National Health Service [15]. A previous study of ovarian cancer patients found that 74% said they would pay 20% of the cost of genetic testing that would aid their therapy and only a quarter of respondents would pay the full cost [16].…”
Section: Willingness To Paymentioning
confidence: 99%