Patient Perceptions and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation From Medical Imaging

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Although imaging has become a standard tool of modern medicine, its widespread use has been paralleled by an increasing cumulative radiation dose to patients despite technological advancements and campaigns calling for better awareness and minimization of unnecessary exposures. OBJECTIVETo assess patients' knowledge about medical radiation and related risks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA survey study of hospitals in Italy was conducted; all patients in waiting rooms for medical imaging procedures before undergoing imaging examinations at 16 teaching and nonteaching hospitals were approached to take the survey. The survey was performed from June 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESSurvey respondents' basic knowledge of ionizing radiation levels and health risks, earlier imaging tests performed, and information and communication about radiation protection issues.RESULTS Among 3039 patients invited to participate, the response rate was 94.3% (n = 2866).Participants included 1531 women (53.4%); mean (SD) age was 44.9 (17.3) years. Of the 2866 participants, 1529 (53.3%) were aware of the existence of natural sources of ionizing radiation. Mammography (1101 [38.4%]) and magnetic resonance imaging (1231 [43.0%]) were categorized as radiation-based imaging modalities. More than half of the 2866 patients (1579 [55.1%]; P = .03) did not know that chest computed tomography delivers a larger dose of radiation than chest radiography, and only 1499 (52.3%) knew that radiation can be emitted after nuclear medicine examinations (P = .004). A total of 667 patients (23.3%) believed that radiation risks were unrelated to age, 1273 (44.4%) deemed their knowledge about radiation risks inadequate, and 2305 (80.4%) preferred to be informed about radiation risks by medical staff. A better knowledge of radiation issues was associated with receiving information from health care professionals (odds ratio [OR], 1.71;

3D Reconstruction with Coronary Artery Based on Curve Descriptor and Projection Geometry-Constrained Vasculature Matching

“…For each vascular segment of interest, we choose two images from different angles for reconstruction, each of which is a single static 512 × 512 image and its frame rate is 66.67. These images are usually generated by XRA and may pose a risk of radiation exposure [24].…”

Not only lymphadenopathy: case of chest lymphangitis assessed with MRI after COVID 19 vaccine

“…In fact, a datum seen as an occult sign of neoplasm could determine an economic waste linked to the execution of various radiological investigations, even very expensive, for the search for a tumour that probably does not exist. Radiological examinations that often involve the use of ionizing radiation, with known effects on the health of citizens [ 47 , 48 ], should be optimize ensuring the lowest reasonably achievable exposure levels (ALARA principle) [ 49 – 55 ].…”

Optimization of Image Quality and Organ Absorbed Dose for Pediatric Chest X-Ray Examination: In-House Developed Chest Phantom Study

“…Particularly, radiographers should have familiarity and understanding of clinical examinations to preserve the low risk of radiation without compromising the diagnostic accuracy of pediatric radiographs [ 5 , 6 ]. Moreover, several studies have reported that patients undergoing diagnostic X-ray examinations tend to have limited knowledge about medical radiation and its associated risks [ 7 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize and estimate the radiation dose with the goal of alleviating induced biological effects, especially in pediatric patients.…”