Patient perception of physician empathy in stroke telemedicine

Abstract

Introduction We assessed patients’ perceptions of physician empathy during telemedicine consultations as compared to in-person consultations during clinical encounters for acute stroke. Methods This prospective cohort study was undertaken at a comprehensive stroke centre hub in collaboration with a distant community hospital spoke site. Eligible participants presented to hub or spoke emergency departments with suspected acute stroke within three hours of symptom onset. Participants were evaluated at the hub site in person or at the remote site via telemedicine by the same group of neurologists. Following acute care decisions, single-visit data including participant-reported assessments of physician empathy were collected within 24 h. The primary outcome was the Consultation and Relational Empathy score. The secondary outcome for the telemedicine cohort was the Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Measure score. Results Between 31 May 2013–13 March 2019, 70 patients completed the study. Fifty patients were seen by telemedicine and 20 patients were seen in person. Median Consultation and Relational Empathy scores (with a possible score of 10–50) were 49 (range 27–50) for telemedicine and 45 (range 26–50) for in-person consultations (Wilcoxon rank sum p = 0.18). Each item of the Consultation and Relational Empathy questionnaire was rated very good or excellent by at least 87% of participants in the telemedicine group. The median Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Measure score was 54 (range 12–60), with each item rated agree or strongly agree by at least 84% of participants. Discussion We found no difference between telemedicine and in-person visits in patient perception of physician empathy in acute stroke care. Therefore, we conclude that empathy can be conveyed by facial expression, voice and attentiveness in a telemedicine encounter and, in the setting of acute stroke care, does not require physical touch or proximity.

Telemedicine as the New Outpatient Clinic Gone Digital: Position Paper From the Pandemic Health System REsilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) International Consortium (Part 2)

“…Similarly, successful programs have been undertaken worldwide, such as telestroke programs in Hawaii and South California ( 28 ). There is also evidence to suggest that patients who receive acute stroke assessment through telemedicine do not perceive decreased physician empathy compared to those who receive physical consultation ( 29 ). This somewhat relieves concerns about impaired patient–physician connection through telemedicine.…”

Patient’s Perspectives of Telepsychiatry: The Past, Present and Future

“…The collaborative care model includes the provision of specialist psychiatric services from urban health centers by engaging primary care physicians in the evaluation and treatment of patients in the remote locale using a digital platform. Most studies 7 , 8 , 11 , 14 – 16 showed that this model is cost-effective. The conventional integrated care models have often suffered insufficient funding, lack of continued support from psychiatrists, limited coverage of mental disorders during the training, and monitoring.…”

Remote management of musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice

“…For musculoskeletal assessments, clinicians cannot rely on passive physical testing; notably, however, this should not be the dominant source of clinical evidence during in-person practice either. 17 , 87 Gaining a thorough understanding of a patient's condition through robust questioning underpins good assessment and can be achieved remotely.…”