2014
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient‐perceived outcome after sialendoscopy using the glasgow benefit inventory

Abstract: 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(88 reference statements)
4
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two different studies have used the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) survey to assess possible improvement of patients` HRQoL after sialendoscopy. A positive effect was noted in both studies, comparing well with other otorhinolaryngological procedures where the GBI has been reported [28, 29]. Meier et al [29] showed that the presence of stones as well as the examination of the parotid gland had a significant positive impact on GBI score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Two different studies have used the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) survey to assess possible improvement of patients` HRQoL after sialendoscopy. A positive effect was noted in both studies, comparing well with other otorhinolaryngological procedures where the GBI has been reported [28, 29]. Meier et al [29] showed that the presence of stones as well as the examination of the parotid gland had a significant positive impact on GBI score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…More studies for comparison are shown in Table . For a more extensive comparison of GBI scores for otorhinolaryngological procedures, see the article by Ianovski et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventional salivary gland research continues to be constricted by the lack of a standardized, validated symptom assessment tool. Recently, Ianovski et al [24] reported a 2-year prospective study using a patient-perceived benefit scale (Glasgow Benefit Inventory) in sialendoscopic patients. This is a step in the right direction; however, an intervention-specific scale similar to the SNOT-22 for chronic rhinosinusitis may be of more utility in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%