2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01149.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient involvement in blood transfusion safety: patients' and healthcare professionals' perspective

Abstract: Overall, both patients and healthcare professionals view patient involvement in transfusion-related behaviours quite favourably and appear in agreement regarding the behaviours patients should adopt an active role in. Further work is needed to determine the effectiveness of this approach to improve transfusion safety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we also found that doctors expressed considerably less favourable attitudes towards patient involvement, both in terms of approval of the patients behaviour (in the scenario) and in terms of level of support for being asked themselves the question by a patient (in real life). This finding mirrors the previous research that we conducted on HCPs' attitudes towards patient involvement which revealed overall nurses were more willing to support patient involvement in safety‐relevant activities .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, we also found that doctors expressed considerably less favourable attitudes towards patient involvement, both in terms of approval of the patients behaviour (in the scenario) and in terms of level of support for being asked themselves the question by a patient (in real life). This finding mirrors the previous research that we conducted on HCPs' attitudes towards patient involvement which revealed overall nurses were more willing to support patient involvement in safety‐relevant activities .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…24 and 5.38). 64 Additionally, while HCP encouragement increased intentions to ask about HH across all three groups, a greater impact was observed for lay patients (mean ¼ 5.64 and 5.50) 62 than medical students (mean ¼ 5.6 and 5.3) 65 or HCPs (mean ¼ 6.24 and 6.36). 64 Another article reported that patients who are clinically trained (compared with those who are not clinically trained) were more willing to question doctors and nurses about their HH, with and without HCP encouragement, but it was not reported whether or not this difference was significant.…”
Section: Differences Between Lay and Expert Patientsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…High volume centers are also more able to more efficiently and effectively train their personnel and manage blood donations [ 18 20 ]. High volume centers with centralized reference laboratories allow personnel to become more experienced [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%