2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4139-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Experience with the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Michigan’s Statewide Multi-Payer Demonstration: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: PCMH practices have more positive patient experiences across domains characteristic of advanced primary care. A mature multi-payer model has the strongest, most consistent association with a better patient experience, pointing to the need to provide consistent expectations, resources, and time for practice transformation. Our results held for a general population and a high-risk population which has much more contact with the healthcare system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCMH initiatives sup ported by public payers include Medicare's Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPC), Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+), the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration, and the Medicaid Health Homes State Option. In recent years, there has been a growth in private and multipayer PCMH initiatives as well (Carrillo et al, 2014;Friedberg, Schneider, et al, 2014;Cole et al, 2015;Takach et al, 2015;Sarinopoulos et al, 2017). The majority of PCMH models remain focused on primary care, but recently there has been more experimentation with "intensive medical homes" and "specialty medical homes" for patients with advanced chronic illness who require close follow up by specialists (Walker, 2017).…”
Section: Patient-centered Medical Homes Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCMH initiatives sup ported by public payers include Medicare's Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPC), Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+), the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration, and the Medicaid Health Homes State Option. In recent years, there has been a growth in private and multipayer PCMH initiatives as well (Carrillo et al, 2014;Friedberg, Schneider, et al, 2014;Cole et al, 2015;Takach et al, 2015;Sarinopoulos et al, 2017). The majority of PCMH models remain focused on primary care, but recently there has been more experimentation with "intensive medical homes" and "specialty medical homes" for patients with advanced chronic illness who require close follow up by specialists (Walker, 2017).…”
Section: Patient-centered Medical Homes Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PCMH research most often focuses on system-level indicators (eg, shifts in healthcare use). 1 Research highlighting the patient perspective is more sparse and commonly limited in scope, 13 , 14 including a focus on priorities and preferences for transformed practices rather than actual experience, 15 - 17 few elements of the model, 1 , 18 patients with specific health conditions, 11 , 18 and/or reporting survey data, 19 , 20 without the nuance offered by qualitative methods. Results are unclear, 5 , 14 , 21 with some research suggesting PCMH recognition improves patient experience, 19 , 21 while other studies suggesting there is no difference between PCMH and non-PCMH providers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to address the gaps in the literature-and to contribute to the growing body of evaluations [19][20][21][22] of largescale PCMH expansion-the current study, which was part of a statewide, mixed-methods evaluation of the NY SIM, 10 explores experience and perspectives regarding PCMH implementation and PCMH core components from a diverse population of NYS PCMH patients and providers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative studies to date have shown mixed but promising results. [3][4][5][6][7] Qualitative research allows for more in-depth exploration and deeper understanding of patients' experiences of care, but little work has been done in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%