2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient experience of different regional models of urgent and emergency care: a cross-sectional survey study

Abstract: ObjectivesTo compare user experiences of 8 regional urgent and emergency care systems in the Republic of Ireland, and explore potential avenues for improvement.DesignA cross-sectional survey.SettingSeveral distinct models of urgent and emergency care operate in Ireland, as system reconfiguration has been implemented in some regions but not others. The Urgent Care System Questionnaire was used to explore service users' experiences with urgent and emergency care. Linear regression and logistic regression were us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey found no association between the type of emergency care model adopted in different regions and self-reported care experience. 17 Overall, 36% of service users in the SIREN survey rated their care as excellent, slightly lower than figures from comparable studies conducted in the UK where ratings of 39% and 41% were reported. The only significant finding was that service users in the mid-west region, which had shut three EDs and centralised care to one tertiary hospital, reported significantly lower overall ratings of care than those in the Dublin north-east region, which has undertaken little change.…”
Section: What Was the Impact Of Emergency Care Reconfiguration In Irecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The survey found no association between the type of emergency care model adopted in different regions and self-reported care experience. 17 Overall, 36% of service users in the SIREN survey rated their care as excellent, slightly lower than figures from comparable studies conducted in the UK where ratings of 39% and 41% were reported. The only significant finding was that service users in the mid-west region, which had shut three EDs and centralised care to one tertiary hospital, reported significantly lower overall ratings of care than those in the Dublin north-east region, which has undertaken little change.…”
Section: What Was the Impact Of Emergency Care Reconfiguration In Irecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Respect was demonstrated on a spectrum, ranging from a lack of respect to a high level of respect. Positive experiences were associated with being listened to carefully and attentively, [35-37, 40, 46, 47, 50-60] having the opportunity to talk uninterrupted, [47,50] being taken seriously, [36,45,49,51,61,62] and feeling as though care providers had the time for them. [51,53,55,59,60,63,64] Similarly, care providers that were on the same level as patients (i.e.…”
Section: Respecting Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[64] • "I was told how long I'd have to wait." [61] • "This is not the first time I've been here and was so ill and had to sit and wait. Then, when I get to the next spot, I have to sit and wait.…”
Section: Spending Time In the Emergency Department Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis within this study was conducted using secondary data collected by the INMO, HSE and HIPE. However, the development of this research question was informed by public and patient experiences as identified by studies conducted by Droog et al 41 and Foley et al 42 as part of the wider Study of the Impact of Reconfiguration on Emergency and Urgent Care Networks (SIREN) project, of which this study is a part. Preliminary findings from this study were disseminated to patients and the wider public through a number of public meetings held in the regions included in this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%