2022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Experience from an eHealth Perspective: A Scoping Review of Approaches and Recent Trends

Abstract: Objectives: Patients’ experiences are increasingly gaining interest in multiple research fields. Researchers have applied various approaches to studying patient experience (PX); however, there is no commonly agreed-upon definition of PX. This scoping review focuses on PX from an eHealth perspective. Our aim was to: 1) describe how PX has been defined, 2) investigate which factors influencing PX and components of PX have been identified and researched, 3) explore the methods used in studying PX, and 4) find out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(199 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients, crude quantitative measurement of satisfaction with digital hospitals neglects the complex nature of the digital patient experience [110] or emerging consumer digital health themes (eg, ethical implications, security, choice, privacy, transparency, accuracy, user-friendliness, and equity of access) [111,112]. The authors support the call by Viitanen et al [23] to develop a framework to describe the different aspects of patient experience and correlate them with appropriate methods for studying patient experience in this context.…”
Section: Principal Findings and Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For patients, crude quantitative measurement of satisfaction with digital hospitals neglects the complex nature of the digital patient experience [110] or emerging consumer digital health themes (eg, ethical implications, security, choice, privacy, transparency, accuracy, user-friendliness, and equity of access) [111,112]. The authors support the call by Viitanen et al [23] to develop a framework to describe the different aspects of patient experience and correlate them with appropriate methods for studying patient experience in this context.…”
Section: Principal Findings and Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Generally, virtual consultations are accepted and practical compared to in-person visits. However, it is reported that older patients prefer face-to-face appointments [ 64 ]. Patients are aware that telehealth may provide benefits regarding such perspectives of care as location, access, and efficiency [ 65 ].…”
Section: Patients’ and Healthcare Providers’ Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure a positive patient experience, one should assess their capacity to use the proposed technology and provide detailed information and instructions. The ease of contacting the clinic and scheduling the in-person appointment should be also ensured [ 64 ].…”
Section: Patients’ and Healthcare Providers’ Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors emphasized that low-and middle-income countries are motivated to embrace this digital shift, but that this requires addressing the inevitable technical and privacy issues and a robust health information system that is essential to ensure continuity of care. Check out the survey paper of the CIS section which focuses on patient experience and how it is defined and captured in eHealth [28]. The authors reviewed 44 papers, and concluded that patient experience is complex and multifaceted, requiring additional research to better understand this phenomenon.…”
Section: Highlights Of the 31 St Edition Of The Imia Yearbookmentioning
confidence: 99%