2014
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
169
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
169
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] There is still only a rudimentary understanding of how PHRs can contribute to improving inpatient experience and increasing patient engagement in the hospital setting. [37] 5.1 Implications…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] There is still only a rudimentary understanding of how PHRs can contribute to improving inpatient experience and increasing patient engagement in the hospital setting. [37] 5.1 Implications…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This counterintuitive finding implies that the patients' self-abasement or inability to express themselves given the unbalanced power relations with health-care staff and low health literacy. Patient engagement is conceptualized as patients' self-awareness and ability to express their physical and emotional needs, thus resulting in better orientated professional interventions [37]. Discussing preferences and views or disagreeing with a recommendation are communication skills used in everyday life, but for many patients these may be novel in the context of a medical consultation [38] [39], which could impede the development of effective self-coping strategies for disease management [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that well-designed collaborative technologies speed up the development of common ground by allowing teams to share knowledge, manage actions, and make decisions efficiently [8]. While improving patient access to health information leads to increased patient participation in health-related decision-making, it is not merely the access to data that creates this outcome [9]. It is the development of common ground between patients and clinicians that makes superior patient engagement possible.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%