2012
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient doses using multidetector computed tomography scanners in Kenya

Abstract: Assessment of patient dose attributed to multislice computed tomography (CT) examination. A questionnaire method was developed and used in recording the patient dose and scanning parameters for the head, chest, abdomen and lumbar spine examinations. The patient doses due to brain, chest and abdomen examination were above the international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) by factors of between one and four. The study demonstrated that the use of multislice CT elevates patient radiation dose, justifying the ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and comparison of these values with those from other countries is presented in Table 3. All adult findings from Turkey were consistent with the studies published in other countries (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Pediatric patient findings were also consistent with similar published studies (19)(20)(21)(23)(24)(25)(26), except for DLP values, which were higher in Turkey.…”
Section: Main Pointssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…2 and comparison of these values with those from other countries is presented in Table 3. All adult findings from Turkey were consistent with the studies published in other countries (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Pediatric patient findings were also consistent with similar published studies (19)(20)(21)(23)(24)(25)(26), except for DLP values, which were higher in Turkey.…”
Section: Main Pointssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The mean effective dose per examination type was used to calculate the collective effective dose in CT. The annual collective effective dose (S) from the CT scanning examination patient population was determined for each age group as a product of mean effective dose and the total patient population per examination type (9) . As a guideline for good practice, the third quartile patient dose values for each age group examination procedure irrespective of the hospital or CT scanner model were determined and proposed as the initial national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for each CT procedure.…”
Section: Reference Level For Ct Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kenya, the number of CT scanners in direct medical use increased by over 80 % in the past decade (8) . Previous studies have shown that CT examinations were performed using manufacturer-prescribed protocols, resulting in multiphase protocols and inadequate professional effort geared towards developing local optimal conditions commensurate to specific patient needs and indication (9) . Because the country does not have wellestablished national radiation dose management strategies, the radiation exposure to patients is not adequately managed, creating a need for optimisation and patient dose monitoring, record keeping, analysis as well as tracking of the exposed individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative KAP values for IPs were used with effective dose conversion factors to obtain effective dose for full examinations (Korir 2013;Hart and Wall 2002;Damilakis et al 2006;Schultz et al 1999). Effective dose for computed tomography examinations was estimated from the Dose length product (DLP) values and region-specific normalized effective dose coefficient (E DLP ) values in mSv mGy j1 cm j1 (Korir et al 2012;Hyun 2012;Huda et al 2011;Wambani et al 2010). …”
Section: Estimation Of Effective Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The national annual number of CT examinations increased by 60% (from 44,500 to 112,000) from 2007 to 2011, which demonstrated the impact of Multi Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) introduced into the country (Korir et al 2012). There may be unnecessary imaging referrals for payments to the referring clinician, and hence an increase in prescription.…”
Section: Ct Examination Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%