1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02352255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient dose in dual x-ray absorptiometry

Abstract: Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides a convenient, non-invasive method of assessing skeletal bone mineral which is widely used for clinical studies. This report describes a study to estimate the effective dose of radiation (ICRP-60 (1990)) to a typical female patient from scans performed on three DXA scanners: the Hologic QDR-1000, QDR-1000/W and QDR-2000. The scans modes studied were: total body; anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine; lateral lumbar spine; proximal femur; distal forearm. An ionization chamber… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
1
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
55
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…DXA values are also influenced by inhomogeneities in soft-tissue composition and fat distribution (9,10). The inability to account for growth-related variations in bone and body size and composition with this projection technique limits DXA bone determinations and leads to inaccurate measurements (7,(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DXA values are also influenced by inhomogeneities in soft-tissue composition and fat distribution (9,10). The inability to account for growth-related variations in bone and body size and composition with this projection technique limits DXA bone determinations and leads to inaccurate measurements (7,(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DXA values are also influenced by inhomogeneities in soft-tissue composition and fat distribution (9,10). The inability to account for growth-related variations in bone and body size and composition with this projection technique limits DXA bone determinations and leads to inaccurate measurements (7,(11)(12)(13)(14).In contrast, quantitative computed tomography (CT) and peripheral quantitative CT are not subject to these limitations because they provide a threedimensional assessment of bone structure. In addition, these techniques offer the ability to separate out trabecular bone, which is eight times more metabolically active than cortical bone (5,15-18), and provide a direct measure of volumetric bone density (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the measurements is 1.0 and 2.0% for the FFM and FM, respectively (Mazess et al, 1990;Slosman et al, 1992). The effective total body radiation dose is 5.2 mSv (Blake et al, 1996;Lewis et al, 1994). Percentage of body fat was measured using the manufacturer's default de®ni-tion.…”
Section: Body Composition Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 The effective total body radiation dose is 5.2 mSv. 24,25 The percentage of body fat was measured using the manufacturer's default definition.…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurements and Bioelectrical Impedance Analmentioning
confidence: 99%